Petitioner challenged police harassment via writ petition under Article 226. Petitioner sought direction to police not to take coercive steps under an FIR. Court disposed of petition granting liberty to approach appropriate authority.
Granting liberty to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy as available in law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original J urisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF NOVEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 17534 OF 2020
Between:
Mohammed Khaiseruddin, S/o Late lvlohammed Sirajuddin, aged about 37 years, Occ. Business, R/o. Plot No. 116/P, Pasha Colony, Puppalguda, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER
ANO
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ order or directions, more pafiicularly WRIT of IVANDAIVIUS declaring the action of respondents 4 to B herein in harassing, threatening and interfering with the life and liberty of the petitioner by calling and detaining him in the police station under the guise of FIR No.401i2020 da|ed. 2410912020 for the offences U/s. 420 IPC and Section 7 of Essential Commodities Act 1955 on the file of respondent No.4 Patencheru police station is illegal, arbitrary, unjust, against all canons of fair play and Article, 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondenls 4 to 8 not to take any coercive steps against the petitioner in any manner. any manner.
lA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 4 to B herein not to take any coercive steps against the petitioner in any manner under the guise of FIR No.401/2020 dated. 2410912020 for the offences U/s. 420 IPC and Section 7 of Essential Commodities Act 1955 on the file of respondent No.4 Patencheru police statron.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. L. RAM SINGH
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 6: AGP FOR HOME
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.7 & 8: NONE APPEARED
The Court made the following: ORDER
-)
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P,NAVEEN RAO
1VRIT PETITION No.17534 OF 2O2O
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home.
SD/.V.SU ASSISTANT REG RAR ,TRUE COPY// SECTI OFFICER
To, '1 . The station House officer, patancheru police Statron, sanga Reddy District 2. One CC to Sri L. Ram Sinqh, Advocate IOPUCI
HIGH COURT
DATED:1011112020
ORDER
W.P.No.17534 ot 2020
.r:: t!.. r
1 HE STA
(
(
oo I I ir0v 2020
c
-t
* *
9i.S,,ATCP. C9
1
DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COTS
6,"P eL )r-\B , F-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant stay on coercive police steps against the petitioner under the guise of an FIR.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Mohammed Khaiseruddin
The State of Telangana
The Superintendent of Police, Sanga Reddy District
The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Patancheru
The Station House Officer, Palancheru Police Station
Inspector of Police, Patancheru Police Station
P. Naveen Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
