Petitioner challenged interference by Respondent No.2 with possession of patta land. Court held police visit for investigation does not equate to illegal interference with civil disputes.
Petition disposed of; miscellaneous petitions pending stood closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE Ar_ H YD Es;fJi DoF IDpectat Original Jurisdiction)
rELAN GANA
TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF NOVEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENil'''"'^
rHE HoNouRABLE 3[F:rESdcE p. NAVEEN RAo
Between:
WRIT PET ITION N O: '15879 oF 2020
Appanaboina Venkaiah -S/o. Sambaiah. Age. 60 years. Occ. Agriculture, r]iJrri" nc uiY\i r g o n o a D i st ri ct R/o. D a m a ra c he rt a Vi I I a g e. oi.nr ru "ril ...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitutron of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of fVlandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.2 in interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the Petitioner in respect of his patta land in Sy. No. 107 and 108 admeasuring Ac. 2-00 gts., and Ac.0-32 gts respectively situated at Veerappagudem Sivaru, Damaracherla Village and [,4andal, Nalgonda District as illegal, arbitrary, u nco nstitutio na I and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the Respondent No.2 not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the Petitioner over his patta land in Sy. No. 107 and 108 admeasuring Ac. 2-00 gts. and 0.32 gts., respectively situated at Veerappagudem Sivaru, Damaracherla Village and lvlandal, Nalgonda District
lA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.2 not to interfere with the peacefulpossession and enjoyment of the Petitioner over his agricultural land in Sy. No. 107 and'108 admeasuring Ac. 2-00 gts. and 0.32 gts. respectively situated at Veerappagudem Sivaru, Damaracherla Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District,pending disposal of the above writpetition
Counsel for the Petitioner : SMT. ANNAPURNA SREERAM
Counsel forthe Respondents: AGP FOR HOME
The Court made the following: ORDER
1-
HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITIONNo.1 5879 0F 2020
ORDER:
Heard learneclcounsel lor petitionerand learnedAssistant Government Pleaderfor Home.
J.
V ,l
investigation into the crime reported by Smt.Nal.lani Sravani and under the guise of investigation, they shall not interfere into the inter se civil disputes between the petitioner and Smt.Nallani Sravani.
SD/.B.SATYAVATHI
ASSISTANT REGIS
,TRUE COPY//
\
To
SECTION OFFICER
n
,l
!
HIGH COURT
DATED:1011112020
"( HE
'(-
I o
21 NO lJ 2m
-a', *
ORDER
WP.No.15879 of 2020
D!SPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS.
.L/
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the interference of police in peaceful possession of petitioner's land constitutes illegal action valid for writ of mandamus.
Whether police investigation in registered crime justifies interference with peaceful possession and enjoyment of property.
Appanaboina Venkaiah
State of Telangana
Station House Officer, Wadapally Police Station
P. Naveen Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
