The petitioner alleged non-registration of an FIR regarding a cognizable crime despite lodging a complaint. The court noted from the Assistant Government Pleader that the FIR was already registered and investigation was ongoing, causing the writ petition to fail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA (Special Original J urisd iction)
IVONDAY ,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 15426 OF 2020
Betwee n:
Pambali Venkatesh, S/o Pambali Sataiah, Aged About - 39 Years, Occ- Business, Rlo 27-117, Thakkapally, Yacharam, Kothapalli, R R District
...PETITIONER
AND
.RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more padicularly one in the nature of writ of MANDAMUS declaring the in action of the official Respondents in not register the FIR on petitioner compliant dated 22.08.2020 is arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional, in violation of Article 14, 19 and 2'1 of the Constitution of lndia, in violation of the Hon'ble Supreme Court Judgment of Lalith Kumari Vs State of Uttar Pradesh (2014) 2 SCC 1 and consequently may direct the 4th Respondent to register the FIR on respondent no. 5 and 6 to conduct the enquiry.
lA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.4 to register the FIR on petitioner compliant daled 22.08.2020, pending disposal of the Writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI D. SRINIVAS
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: GP FOR HOME
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.5 & 6:---------
l'hc Court rnadc thc lollo$ ing: ORI)ER
l
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION No.15426 oF 2O2O
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel fbr the petitioner and learned Assistant Governmcnt Pleacler for Home appearing for respondents I to 4.
misccllancous pctition s shall stand closcd.
SD/.B.SATYAVA ASSISTANT RE R //TRUE COPY// SECT FICER
To,
'1 . One CC to Sri D. Snnivas, Advocate [OPUC]
3 Two CD Copies
SM ,\tll
HIGH COURT
DATED: 14l09/2020
ORDER
-( HE sIA fr
(
Jo
o 22SEPm z
r)
D.r
-<=.: v/
WP.No.15426 of 2020
DISMISSING THE WP
WITHOUT COSTS
r '{ \1,, (i\2.er -{!L
Pambali Venkatesh
The State of Andhra Pradesh
The Deputy Commissioner of Police, L.B.Nagar
The Assistant Commissioner of police, Ibrahimpatnam
The Station House Officer, Yacharam Police Station
Deverakonda Yadagiri
P. Naveen Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
