In a contempt petition, the High Court of Telangana recorded counsel's submission that common orders in the underlying writ petitions were complied with and subsequently closed the contempt case without passing any punitive order.
Closed the contempt case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEIUBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P NAVEEN RAO
CONTEMPT CASE N O: 144 OF 2020
Contempt Case under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 punish the Respondents herein for his wilful disobedience and deliberate violation of the Common orders of this Hon'ble Court, dated, 2311012019 in l.A. No. 1 and 2 of 2019 in W.P. No. 21780 of 2019
Between:
Sri M Ravinder Reddy, S/o Late lr/ Papi Reddy Aged 50 years, Occ. Business R/o H.No.197iF Plot.No.53, Lane No.13 Ravindra Nagar Colony, Street No.8 Habsiguda Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS/CONTEM NORS
Counsel for the Petitioner:
Counsel for the Respondents:
SRI P. SHASHI KIRAN G.P. FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following: OROER
2
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
CONTEMPT CASE No. 144 OF 2O2O
ORDER:
Both the learned counsel represent that thc orders passed b1, this Court in I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2019 in W.P.No.2i780 of 2019 are complied.
Recording the said submission, the contempt case is ciosed.
SD/. M. VIJAYABHASKAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR
,TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
TL --' €
v
HIGH COURT
PNR,J
DATED:1110912020
ORDER
CC.No.144 o12020
\9
.r
O)
7t
s
o
l- s
o <br><br>,.J o ttl *
CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE
't>
,t
<br>T
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri M Ravinder Reddy
Sri Somesh Kumar
Sri T. Chiranjeevulu
R. Staish
P Naveen Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
