Dismissed

Madhvi C Chandaranna (Noynah) v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC10 Sept 2020WP/15269/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana dismissed a writ petition seeking mandamus to direct police to register an FIR. It also considered a petition under Section 151 CPC for similar directions and granted the petitioner liberty to withdraw, leading to dismissal of the writ and closure of related misc. petitions.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy was granted. Writ petition and pending miscellaneous petitions dismissed/closed.

Madhvi C Chandaranna (Noynah) Vs The State of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2020)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶2

THURSDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO: 15269 OF 2020

¶6

Betwee n:

¶7

lVadhvi C Chandaranna (Noynah), d/o. Chandrakaanth V Chandaranna aged about 45 yrs, Occ. Employee, Rlo. 102, Shiv Sai Abode Apartment, beside pearl Apartment lane, Shamlal Begumpet, Hyderabad 500016.

¶8

...PETITIONER

¶9

AND

¶10

The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶11

The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad City at Basheerbagh, Hyderabad.

¶12

The Deputy Commissioner, of Police, Central Zone, Hyderabad

¶13

lnspector of Police, P.S. Abids, Hyderabad.

¶14

Malapaka Surya Prabhakar, S/o. Not known to the Petitioner, Aged. Major, Occ. Business, R/o. C-1 1, Vikrampuri Colony, Near Secunderabad CIub, Sec-bad-09

¶15

IValapaka Sailaja, W/o. IValapaka Surya Prabhakar Aged. Major, Occ. Business, R/o. C-1^'1 , Vikrampuri Colony, Near Secunderabad Club, Sec-bad-09

¶16

lt(alapaka Ramya, M.S. Prabhakar, aged. Major, Occ. Business, R/o. C-1'1 , Vikrampuri Colony, Near Secunderabad Club, Sec-bad-09

¶17

B. lVr. Sai Ram Murthy Konduri, s/o. Not Known to the Petitioner, R/o. C/o. Ir//s. Bharath Engineering Company, 5-5-86, Rani Gunj, Sec-bad03

¶18

...RESPONDENTS

¶19

Petitron under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus the inaction of the Respondent No.2 to 4 in not acting upon my complaint dated 0910A12020 and 2610812020 (Annexure-1 and 2) thereby not instituting enquiry/registering FIR against the respondent No.4 in violation to the provision of Sec .1 54 CRPC is

¶20

arbitrary, illegal, and against the well settled law rendered by the Hon'ble courts and apex court in Lalitha Kumari vs. state of U.P reported in (2014) 2 SCC 1.

¶21

lA NO: 1 OF 2020

¶22

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to register FIR against the unofficial respondents and take action in pursuance to petitioner's complaint dated 0910812020 and 2610812020 pending disposal of the above Writ Petition

¶23

Counsel for the Petitioner:SRl. S. MOUNIS ABIDI

¶24

Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4: AGP FOR HOME

¶25

Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 5 to 8: _

¶26

The Court made the following:

¶27

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO

¶28

WRIT PETITION NO. 15269 OF 2O2O

¶29

ORDER:

¶30

Learned counsel for petitioner seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy as available in law against non-registration of crime.

¶31

Granting said liberty, Writ Petition is dismissed. Pending miscellaneous petitions shall stand closed.

¶32

SD/.N.CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY'

SECTION OFFICER

One CC to Sri. S. I/ounis Abidi, Advocate (OPUC)

¶37

Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad (OUT)

¶38

Two CD Copies.

PIV

HIGH COURT

DATED:10/09/2020

ORDER

e s IA
1 l{
({v 1 I SEP 2020 oz
a) 1'1

¶45

WP.No.15269 of 2020

¶46

Dismissing the WP

¶47

q
?pl-D

Madhvi C Chandaranna (Noynah) v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Madhvi C Chandaranna (Noynah) v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Doreti Swapna Vs The State of Telengana

K Rajesh Reddy Vs the State of Tg

Chava Suresh Babu Vs the State of Ts

Ragula Ramulu Vs The State of Telangana

Naini Rajender Reddy Vs The State of Telangana and Another

Konkala Suresh Vs The state of Telengana