Dismissed

Pendyala Gopal And 4 Others v. State of Telangana And 3 Others

Telangana HC4 Feb 2020WP/1476/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging the respondent police officials sending witnesses to the petitioners' house and allegedly interfering in their civil proceedings. Relying on the respondents' denial of the allegations, the Court closed the petition with no further orders.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition closed with a direction to the respondents to act in accordance with the law while investigating the registered crime.

Pendyala Gopal And 4 Others Vs State… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Telangana HC (2020)

¶1

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE T.VI NOD KUMAR

¶2

WRI T PETI TI ON No.1476 of 2020

¶3

O R D E R :

¶4

This writ petition is filed to declare the action of the 3^rd respondent in sending the police officials to the petitioners’ house and directing them to appear before the said respondent and compelling the petitioners to compromise with the 4^th respondent in civil cases, i.e., C.C.C.A.No.288 of 2017 and A.S.No.1031 of 2012, pending before this Court, failing which, threatening the petitioners to implicate in criminal cases, thereby interfering in the personal life and liberty of the petitioners, as illegal and arbitrary.

¶5

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home.

¶6

Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, dated 27.01.2020, a copy of which is placed on record of the Court, whereby the 3^rd respondent has denied the interference into the life and liberty of the petitioners, and the allegation of the petitioners, that they are being detained in the police station and being compelled to compromise with the 4^th respondent in civil cases, i.e., C.C.C.A.No.288 of 2017 and A.S.No.1031 of 2012, pending before this Court, as baseless and far from truth. By the said written instructions, it is also stated that, upon receiving a private complaint, the respondents have registered a case in Crime No.122 of 2019 dated 22.02.2019 for the offences under Sections 447, 504 and 506 IPC and Section 156(3) Cr.P.C., on the file of the 3^rd respondent, against the petitioners and investigation has been taken up in the matter. It is further stated that during the course of investigation, the

¶7

¶8

complainant has been examined and recorded his detailed statement and issued notice under Section 91 Cr.P.C. to the complainant asking him to produce relevant documents for the purpose of investigation. Learned AGP further stated that except conducting investigation into the crime registered, the 3^rd respondent did not harass or interfere with the property, life and liberty of the petitioners, as alleged.

¶9

Having regard to the above assertion made on behalf of the respondents by the aforestated written instructions, no further orders need be passed in the present writ petition, except observing that the respondents shall act in accordance with law while investigating into Crime No.122 of 2019.

¶10

The writ petition is accordingly closed. Pending miscellaneous

¶11

petitions, if any, shall also stand closed. No order as to costs.

¶12

_____________________ JUSTI CE T.VI NOD KUMAR Date:04.02.2020 GJ

Pendyala Gopal And 4 Others v. State of Telangana And 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pendyala Gopal And 4 Others v. State of Telangana And 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kurva Anjaneyulu Vs The State of Telangana and 4 others

Telangana Handball Association and 2 Others Vs The State of Telangana and 3 Others

Bathini Sailu and 4 others Vs The State of Telangana and 6 others

Kurva Suresh Vs The State of Telangana and 4 others

M.A. Rasheed Parvez Vs The State of Telangana

Kuthuru Aruna Vs The State of Telangana