Dismissed

M.A. Rasheed Parvez v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC4 Feb 2020WP/11544/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court dismissed a writ petition challenging interference with construction on Wakf property. Dismissing the claim of police interference, the court ordered an investigation into the already registered criminal case and closed further proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Orders respondent police authorities to investigate into Crime No.28 of 2019 and closes the Writ Petition.

M.A. Rasheed Parvez Vs The State of Telangana — Property and Title | Telangana HC (2020)

¶1

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR

¶2

WRIT PETITION No.11544 of 2019

¶3

ORDER :

¶4

The present writ petition is filed to declare the action of respondents 1 to 4 in interfering with the civil disputes and construction made by the petitioners over house bearing No.4-257, Hatai Street, Nizamabad District, as illegal and arbitrary.

¶5

Heard Sri M.A.K. Mukheed, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondents 1 to 4. Despite the name of the learned Standing Counsel for the Telangana State Wakf Board, Hyderabad, appearing for the 5^th respondent, being mentioned, none appears for the 5^th respondent Wakf Board.

¶6

Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, dated 12.06.2019, submits that one M.A.Sajid, who is the Inspector Auditor Wakf Board, Nizamabad and Kamareddy Districts, has given a complaint on 27.02.2019 alleging that one Awais was residing in Wakf premises house bearing No.4-2-57 (new) 4-2-490 (old) in the Hatai Street of Nizamabad Town by illegally trespassing into it and started construction on the subject Wakf property and raising the RCC columns and that basing on the above said complaint, a case was registered in Crime No.28 of 2019, under Sections 447 & 427 of IPC of II Town Police Station, Nizamabad, on 27.02.2019. It is submitted that the petitioners are the sons of Md.Awais @ Md. Abdul Waheed. It is further submitted that earlier also, the

¶7

2 TVK,J W.P.No.11544 of 2019

¶8

petitioners filed a writ petition in W.P.No.5423 of 2019 to declare the action of the respondents in interfering and not allowing the petitioners to continue with their on-going authorized construction over the house bearing No.4-2-57, Hatai Street, Nizamabad Town and District and the said writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn on 04.06.2019. It is further submitted that except investigating into the complaint made, which is registered as Crime No.28 of 2019, the 4^th respondent Police never interfered in the civil disputes of the petitioners and never tried to stop the construction work of the petitioners, as alleged in the writ affidavit.

¶9

Having regard to the specific assertion made on behalf of respondents 1 to 4 that they are not interfering in the civil disputes of the petitioners and the construction made by the petitioners, no further orders need be passed in the matter.

¶10

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. However, since a case is registered in Crime No.28 of 2019, on the file of II Town Police Station, Nizamabad, the respondent authorities shall investigate into the above said crime, in accordance with law.

¶11

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed in the light of this final order. No order as to costs.

¶12

____________________________ JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR

¶13

Date: 4^th February, 2020 KL

M.A. Rasheed Parvez v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.A. Rasheed Parvez v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kurva Anjaneyulu Vs The State of Telangana and 4 others

Telangana Handball Association and 2 Others Vs The State of Telangana and 3 Others

Bathini Sailu and 4 others Vs The State of Telangana and 6 others

Kurva Suresh Vs The State of Telangana and 4 others

Pendyala Gopal And 4 Others Vs State of Telangana And 3 Others

Kuthuru Aruna Vs The State of Telangana