The petitioner filed writ petitions alleging inaction by respondent Nos. 3 and 4 in not registering a crime based on a 2020 complaint. The court, noting subsequent developments, held the petitions to be infructuous and dismissed them.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE S] rs p! ir ir' b,iJi,;,'ilt,. 3,:,LfiAN GA NA
MONDA]:.I]r_E sEVENTH DAy oF sEpTETvBER TWO THOUSAND AND rWCr,r'-'''"'''
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
WRIT P E TITION NO:'1 4715 0 F 2020
Betwee n:
Jaggampudi Kiran Kumar _S^/o. prakash Rao Aged 37 years, N/,lanQer Swathi N promoters o 4 0 2 W, S VS (p) S Lim*ecr N I VA S, Cz so-r)i-o:lo" e c h cii" "v,"s"" Es'#i Lii"oxtiln a"glr, vi.akhaparanam-.reln yde ra b a d. Rio. ,at
AND
...PET|T|oNER
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lhe constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court miy be pleased to issue writ or direction preferably writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondent nos.3 to 4 in not taking action on the complaint dt.14.0g.2020 submitted by the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondent nos. 3 to 4 to proceed with the investigation by registering crime against the unofficial respondent 4 taking into consideration the complaint dated. 1 4.08.2020.
lA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in supporl of the petrtion, the High Courl may bepleased to direct the respondent nos.3 to 4 to proceed with the investigation by registering, crime against the unofficial respondent 4 taking into consideration the complaintdated:14.08.2020.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. K R SRINIVAS
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: GP FOR HOME
Counsel for the RespondentNo. 4:
The Court made thefollowing:ORDER -
HONOURABI,BSRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO lVRI T PIITITION NO.147I s ot !,Q2o
Q8D-ERt
I.carnt:cl c:outttscl lirr- 1>cliliottcl' suLrnlits lhitl on a(lcoLllltol subscqucnt d<:veJopmcnLs, caLlsc irr thc wflt pctitiort clocs ttot sLt|vivtr. Recording thc s.rmc, thc \'rit pe tilion is clismissccl as in1'rtrctr-r<.rus, Nr> r--osls. Miscclli:nr:ours ll('titions, il anv pr.nding, stand closed.
SD/. N.CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SEC N OFFICER
To,
'*=4-
t
\
HIGHCOURT
DATED:0710912020
TA re:
1
<br>e
14SEPM o
oo .1,
* 0 i
.alf S o
ORDER
WP.No.14715of 2020
Dismissing the WP As infructuous Without costs.
fr
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court can issue a writ of Mandamus directing police to register a crime and proceed with investigation after subsequent developments have rendered the writ petition infructuous.
Whether the inaction of the police in not taking action on a complaint dated 14.08.2020 can be challenged as illegal and arbitrary.
Jaggampudi Kiran Kumar
The State of Telangana
The Commissioner Of police, Cyberabad
The Station House Officer, Sanathnagar, Hyderabad
JSIV Infrastructure Developer
P. Naveen Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
