In this writ petition challenging police and municipal actions regarding property possession, the Court found no merits as it did not express an opinion on notice or unchallenged municipal decisions. The petition was dismissed with liberty for remedies. Petition disposed.
Liberty granted to work out remedies; Petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 12865 OF 2020
Between:
IMr.Mekala Anji Reddy, late Yella Reddy Aged about R/o 3-84, Hanuman Nagar, Chaitanyapuri, Ranga Reddy District
62 Occ. Agriculture
,,.PETITIONER
AND
.,.RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner's property in Sy No 90A1 (0-26) and 91A (2-14) to an extent of Ac 3.00 gts, situated at Tattianaram Village, Abdullapurmet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District without notice on 1310712020 and 2910712020 as illegal, arbitrary, in violation of principles of naturaljustice and also violation of Article 300-4 and consequently direct the official respondents to pay a compensation of Rs. 3.5 lakhs towards damages to the petitioner and consequently direct not to interfere with thepeaceful possession and enjoyment of thepetitioner's property in Sy No. 90,41 (0-26) and 91A (2-14) to an extent of Ac 3.00 gts, situated at Tattianaram Village, Abdullapurmet Niandal, Ranga Reddy District.
lA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased to direct the respondents not to interfere with thepeaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner's property in Sy No.9OAl (0-26) and 91A (2-14) to an extent of Ac 3.00 gts, situated at Tattianaram Village, Abdullapurmet lvlandal, Ranga Reddy, District, pending disposal of main Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: Mis. CHANDRASEN LAW OFFICES Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2: AGP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRI N. PRAVEEN KUMAR,
SC FOR MUNICIPALITY
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 & 5: SRI S.V.RAMANA
The Court made the following: ORDER
2
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
1VRIT PETITION NO.12865 of 2O2O
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home and learned counsel for respondent Nos 4 and 5.
-)
I
the municipality are not under challenge. The averments in the writ petition proceed as if police were unauthorizedly present when thc incidents took place and were helping the unofficial respondents in undertaking demolition of constructions made by the petitioner. Therefore, there is no merit in the writ petition.
SD/. K.ONESIM ASSISTANTREGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To, 1. The Prl Secretary,Home Department, State of Telangana' Secretariat' BRKR Bhavan. Hvderabad z iiiS'Si"iilrilt'oi!Ebm""r,Hayathnagar Police Station, Ransa Reddv District 3. iii;6;;issLner,turnlcipaliiv,P-ed-da Arnberpet' RRDistrict'
;. d; aC'6Mls. Cn'anoraiein Ldwoffices,Advocate[oPUC]
6: o;; ccio sri S.V.Ramana,Advocate{oPUCl
SM
\ $*-
HIGH COURT
DATED:.031121202O
ORDER
1 HE STE r€
J .A((
C)
t) 3 0 DEC 2020
).:
* Dl-.. .. -
WP.No.12865 ot 2020
DISPOSING OF THE WP
WITHOUT COSTS
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should hold the action of police and municipal authorities in interfering with the petitioner's property possession without notice as illegal, arbitrary, and unconstitutional.
Whether the petitioner is entitled to compensation for damages caused by official respondents.
Whether directions should be issued barring future interference with the peaceful possession of the petitioner's property.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mekala Anji Reddy
State of Telangana
Station House Officer, Hayathnagar
Municipality, Pedda Amberpet
Ammoda Developers & Promoters Pvt. Ltd.
T.V. Ramana
P. NAVEEN RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
