This court dismissed the Civil Revision Petition as infructuous because the underlying suit in the lower court had already been disposed of by the relevant date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
IVONDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF IVARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2167 OF 2013
Petition under Article 227 of Constitution of lndia, aggrieved by the Order dated 1310312013 in CMA No.2912012 on the file of the I Addltional District Judge, at Nalgonda preferred against orderdated 31/08/2012 in lA No.993/2012 in OS No.27Bl2012 on the file of the Court of the Junior Civil Judge, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District.
Between:
Thalakoppula Sam Williams, S/o. Late T.Samuel
...PETITIONER/ PETITIONER
AND
Dubba Ashok Sunder, S/o. Danaiah
...RESPONDENT/ RESPONDENT
CRPMP. NO: 2859 OF 2013
Petition under Section 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operatlon of the order dated 13.03.2013 in CMA No.29 of 2012 on the file of the courl of 1"t Additional District and Sessions Judge at Nalgonda pending disposal of main CRP.
For the Petitioner : SRI K.MAHIPATHI RAO, Advocate
For the Respondent : SRI R.SRIDHAR, Advocate
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2167 OF 2O1.3
ORDER:
No representation for both sides.
The case status placed by the Registry before this Court reveals that the subject suit in O.S.No.27B of 2072 or th{: file oF the Junior Civil Judge, Nalgonda, was disposed of ott 08.09.2014. Therefore, nothing survives for adjudication in this ci'/il revision petition, which is iiled against the appeal wherein th,t interlocutory orderpassed in the said suit was challenged.
Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous Petitions, if any,pending in thi; a:peal shall
stand closed.
Sd/.I,NAGA LAKSHMI ASSISTA N\REGISTRAR ) ,TRUE COPY// 11 ,- -t SE(]TION OFFICER
To
;. on; ic to SriR.Sridliar, Advocate (OPUC)
HIGH COURT
DATED:02l03/2020
,' 1 i\E srArF
,
/,'<(fr /-\
Dl <br>2 I l{i'J ?f?0 ,l
t)))
,'o-
.4<br>g*'59'
ORDER
CRP.No.2167 ol 2013
DISMISSING THE CRI) AS INFRUCTUOUS.
b F
w)p,
Thalakoppula Sam Williams
Dubba Ashok Sunder
Dr. Justice Shameem Akther
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
