Disposed

Vennmalla Venkataramulu v. G.Rama Rao

Telangana HC12 Nov 2020CRP/1816/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Telangana High Court allowed petitioners to withdraw Civil Revision Petition No. 1816 of 2019 under Article 227 following an amicable settlement before a Lok Adalat. The Court closed the revision petition and ordered the closure of pending miscellaneous applications without costs.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to withdraw Civil Revision Petition No. 1816 of 2019. The petition was closed and pending miscellaneous applications were ordered closed.

Vennmalla Venkataramulu Vs G.Rama Rao — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2020)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

THURSDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER IWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G SRI DEVI

¶5

l.A.NO.1of 2020 in/AND

¶6

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1816 OF 2019

¶7

Petition under Article 227 of lhe Constitution of lndia, aggrieved by the Order dated. 3-5-2019 passed in l.A.No 1011 of 2018 in 0.P.No. 227 of 2013 on the fite of the ll Addl. District Judge, Nalgonda at Suryapet.

¶8

Between:

¶9

Vennmalla Venkataramulu, s/o Venkaiah, aged about 45 years, occ Coolie Both are r/o H.No. 2-7-10612, Ambedkar Colony Suryapet Town tr/andal and District.

¶10

Vennmaila Rakesh, s/o Venkataramulu, aged About 20 years, occ Student Both are r/o H.No. 2-7-10612, Ambedkar Colony Suryapet Town Mandal and District.

¶11

...PETITIONERS(PetitioneriClaimants)in Both

¶12

AND

¶13

1, G.Rama Rao, sio Laxmaiah, aged about major^Occ Driver^r/o Chiliakallu^village Jaggaiahpet tr/andal, Krishna District.

¶14

2:. APSRTC^(now TSRTC), rep.by its lvlanaging Director,^{Ivlusheerabad, Hyderabad.}

¶15

.RESPONDENTS(Respondents/ Respondents)in^Both

¶16

lA NO: 1 OF 2019

¶17

Petition under section 151 CPC^{prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in} the affidavit filed in support of the^{petition,the High court maybe pleased to grant} stay of all further^{proceedings in o.P.No. 227 ot 2013 on the file of the ll Addl.} District Judge, Nalgonda at Suryapet,^{pendingdisposal of the main C.R P' in the} interest of^justice.

¶18

IANO: 1O F 2020

¶19

Petition under section^{151 CPC prayingthat in the circumstances stated in} the affidavit filed in support^{of the petition, the High court maybe pleased To permit} ir," p"tition"r herein^{to withdrawthe above CRP.No.1816of 2019, in the interestof} justice.

¶20

Counsel for the^{Petitioner(s):SRl. PRABHAKARBOMMAGANI}

¶21

Counsel for^{the Respondent 2:Sri. A. Ravi Babu(SCTSRTC)}

¶22

Counsel for^{the Respondent 1 :None appeared}

¶23

The Court made^{the following:ORDER}

¶24

HON'BLE JUSTICE G.^{SRI DEVI}

¶25

l.A. No.l of 2020 I n/and

¶26

CIvII- REVISIO N PEl'11-IO\ \o.1816 ol'2019

¶27

COMMON ORDER:

¶28

-lhe c ivil revision petition IS filed chalienging order dated 03.05.2019 passed in I.A .No.l0ll of 20 l8 in OP No.227 ol 20 l3 by the II Additional District Judge, Nal-uonda at Suryapet.

¶29

When the mattef is taken up for hearing, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that during the pendency of the revision petition, the parties have settled the matter arnicablv befbre the Lok Adalat and therefbre, nothing survives for adjudication in this revlston The petitioners have filed I.A .No.l of 2020 seeking to withdraw the revision petition.

¶30

In view of the above submissions of the tearned counsel lor the petitioners, I.A. No. I of 2020 is ordered and consequenrly. the Civil Revision Petition is closed. No order as to costs.

¶31

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.

¶32

SD/-N.CHANDRA SEKHAR o ASSISTANT RE RAR

¶33

//TRUE COPY// SECTI OFFICER

¶34

To,

¶35

The ll Additional District Judge, Nalgonda at Suryapet.

¶36

One CC to SRl. PRABHAKAR BOIVMAGANI Advocate IOPUC]

¶37

One CC to SRl. A. Ravi Babu (SC TSRTC) Advocate [OPUC]

¶38

Two CD Copies

HIGH COURT

DATED:1211112020

COMMON ORDER

l.A.NO.1of 2020 in/AND CRP.No.1816 o1 2O19

¶44

1HE SI4
( t o
$1(
2 7 iloy2020
at
.<br>
o
.s ].

¶45

CLOSING THE C.R.P.

¶46

/,^rJrT ') ) '7,i , i,, L 1/'2a

Vennmalla Venkataramulu v. G.Rama Rao

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vennmalla Venkataramulu v. G.Rama Rao

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

N. Mamatha Vs B. Krishna

A. Narsimha Reddy Vs Mahender Agarwal

Aaluri Mogulaiah Vs Burra Aruna

Rajasthani Bhavan Trust Vs Smt. Asha Devi

Rajasthani Bhavan Trust, Hyderabad Vs Satish Kumar, Hyderabad

Narsingh Singh Vs Kishore Singh