Allowed

Azmath , Mohammed Azmathullah Khan v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC8 Sept 2020CRLP/2320/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana allowed the Criminal Petition and intra-court applications filed by accused persons in Crime No. 94 of 2020. Upon recording that a compromise was reached and a Memorandum of Compromise dated 23-05-2020 was executed by the de-facto complainant and the accused, the Court quashed the FIR and proceedings for bailable and non-bailable offences.

What did the court decide?

FIR No. 94 of 2020 and related proceedings were quashed; intra-court applications I.A. Nos. 3, 4 and 5 were allowed to compound offences and record compromise.

Azmath , Mohammed Azmathullah Khan Vs The State of… — Cheque Dishonour | Telangana HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

TUESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY^{OF SEPTEIVBER}

¶3

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE^{SRIJUSTICEK'LAKSHMAN}

¶6

CRIMINAL PET^TIONN :2320 F 202

¶7

And

¶8

l.A.Nos.3 4and5of^{2020 in C rl.P.No.232 0 of 2020}

¶9

CRIMINAL PETITIO^{N NO:2320 oF 2020}

¶10

Between:

¶11

1, Azmath @^{Mohammed AzmathullahKhan'.S/o Habeebullah Khan' R/o H No} 110 Karkhana^{near Mas.iid Secunderabad'ff yaeraUiO-SOOo15' Telangana' lndia}

¶12

1. Mr. Khaleel^{Ahmed' S/oLateShakeel t1:9-A""d about 30 years' Occupation'} Business'^{R/or io'Karkhana Bazaar ' '-5"i'no"'ur'ad Cantonment'} Secunderabad

¶13

"'Petitioners

¶14

AND

¶15

e Public^{Prosecutor' High Court of}

¶16

1 The State^{of Telangana representedby Th} Telanqana^{at HYderabad} yrs, Occ.^{Private Service' R/o I 2'1'}

¶17

2 N iii*il", R lt4ohan. eriti^{S/o N' Karkhana Ram Shankar' aqed secunderabad38}

¶18

...ResPondents

¶19

Petition^{under Section 482 of Cr'P C praying thatin the clrcumstances stated in the} lvlemorandum^{of Grounds of Criminal Petition'the High Court may be pleasedto call} for the^{recordsrelating to and connectedwith Crime No 94 oI 2O2O on the file of P S} Karkhana,^{Secunderabad and quashthe same}

¶20

t.A.^NO:2OF2020

¶21

that^{in the circumstancesstated} Petitio^{n underSection482 of cr'P 'c praylng} ,^{the High Court may be Pleased} in the^{N,4emoran dum of Grounds of CriminalPetition} 020^{on the file of P S Karkhana'} to staY^{of all further Proceedings in CrimeNo 94 of 2} Secunderabad^{Pending disPosal of the Crl'P}

¶22

erusing^{the Memorandum of} This^{Petition coming on for hearing 'uPon P} arguments^{of Sri IMMANENI} I Petition^{and upon hearing the} Grounds^{of Crimina} lic Prosecutor^{on behalf of the} te for^{the Petitioners and the Pub} RAI\IA^{RAO, Advoca} d of^{Sri IvIOHANIMEDAFZAL HAN'Advocate for the ResPondent} ResPondent^No'1an No²

¶23

Com mon^{c.t. in} I,A.N^{os.: 34and5OF2020}

¶24

Between:

¶25

Private^{Service, R/o 121} ' ankar,^{aged 38 Yrs. Occ} N R [,4ohan,^{S/o N Ram Sh} Secunderabad Karkhana^{Basti, KarKhana} '

¶26

. . . Petitioner/De-facto^{ComplainanURespondentNo 2}

¶27

AND

¶28

The State of^{Telangana, representedby The Public Prosecutor'HighCourt of} Telangana^{at HYderabad}

¶29

.. ' Res Ponde^{nt/ResPondent No'1}

¶30

2 Azmath @ l,4ohammed^{AzmathullahKhan'S/o Habeebullah Khan' R/oH No} t 1o Kark6ana^{near lr4asiid,SlSljtlilt'u"OivJerabad-sooo15'Telangana' lndia}

¶31

a Mr. Khaleel^{Ahmed, S/o Late Shakeel Ahmed Agedaborrt30 vearsoCcupation} Business. R/o^{110, i:";ffi;;"} b^r.Zzr'^{- Secunderabad Cantonment'} Secunderabad

¶32

...Respondents/Petitioners/Accused'

¶33

I,A. N : 3 OF 2020

¶34

Petition under Section^{320 (6) R/W 482 Cr'P'Cpraying that inthe} circumstances stated^{in the accompanying affidavit the High court maybe pleasedto} permit the petitio ner/defacto complainant^{to compoundthe offencesRegistered} against the Respondent/Accused^{under section 448,323,506,504 Riw section 34 IPC} registered in crime No 94/2020^{on the file of P s Karkhana, secunderabadand} quash the proceedings against the respondent^{No 2 and 3 in crime No 94 of 2020on} the file P.S.,Karkhana,Secunderabad

¶35

l.A. NO: 4OF 2020

¶36

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C^praying that in the^{circumstancesstated} in the accompanying affidavit the High Court may be^pleased to^permit the^petitioner lo withdraw his complainant against respondent No 2 and 3 in Crime No 94^{of 2020} on the file of P.S., Karkhana Secunderabad and quashing the FIR in Cr No 94 of 2020 on the file P.S., Karkhana ,Secunderabad by allowing the present compromise petition in terms of memorandum of compromise daled.23-05-2020

¶37

l.A. NO: 5 OF 2020

¶38

Petition under Section 320 (2) R/W 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the accompanying affidavit the High Court may be pleased to record the compromise the in terms of Memorandum to comprise dated. 23-05-2020 in Crl.p No. 232012020 on the file of Hon'ble Court in Crime No 94 of 2020 on the file of P.S., Karkhana Secunderabad and quash the FIR in Cr No 94 of 2020 on the file P.S., Karkhana ,Secunderabad by allowing the^present compromise^petilion

¶39

These^petitions coming on^{for hearing, upon perusing the Nlemorandumof} Grounds of criminal^{Petitionand upon hearingthe arguments of Sri Mohamrned Afzal}

¶40

¶41

Khan, Advocate for the Petitioners and of the Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.'1 and of Sn lmmaneni Rama Rao, Advocate for the Respondent No.2 and 3

¶42

The Court made the following:^ORDER

¶43

.THE HONOURAI}LE SRI JUSTICE^{K' LAKSHN'IAN} CRIMINA^{L PETITIONNo.2320 ()F2)2t)} And I.A. N^{os.3. 4 and5of2020inC rl.P.No. 2320 of 2020}

¶44

ORDER:

¶45

This application^{is filedby the petitioners - acctrsed in Clime} No.94 of^{2020of KarkhanaPolice Station' Secunderabad' registered} for the offences^{under Sections 448,323'506 and 504 read with 34} lPC, to^{quasl-r the proceedingsin the above saidcrir.t.re'}

¶46

During^{the pendency of the present crin.rinalpetition'the} 2"r respondent -^cle -facto^{complainanthas filed I'A t''No 3 ol 2020to} permit him to compor.rnd the^{ot'1ence.LA' No.'t of 2020is liledby' the} 2"d respondent - cle fctcto complainant^{to permit him to rvithdrarvthe} complaint in Crime No.94 of^{2020 against the petitioners in the} clirninal l)etitiotr. l.A. No.5 ot'1010^{is filcdb1 tlre l' I r'esponclcrrl} -^c/c' J'acto^conplainant .^{to record .the courpronlise in terms of the} rnemoiandum of compromise dated 23.05.2020.

¶47

Vide order dated 17.08.2020, this Cour1, after recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners as rvell as the 2nd respondent that the petitioners and the 2"d responclent rvill appear before the Registrdr (Judicial) of this Court on 26.08.2020 rvitir reference to identitlcation of parties, directed the Registrar (JLrdicial) to submit a report to tl.rat effect by 02.09.2020. Pursuant 10 the said older, the Registrar (Judicial-l) has subrnitted his report datcd 16.08.1020.

¶48

¶49

In the reporr dared 26.0g.2OIOof the Registrar (Judicial_I), it is stated that on oral exarnination, the fnd respondent has stated that he has flled a contplaint against the petitioners and the sarre \vas lc'gistered as Cr.irne No.94 of 2020, dated 0g.05.2020 belble the Karkhana Police Station, Hyderabad, for the ofl.ences under Section 148,323.506 and 504 r.ead r.vith Section 34 IpC and that now he has apploached this Court lor recording the cornpr.omiSe. f-f," .aid Vernorrndum of Corrpromise, dated 1j.0j.20:0 arrd rhe r.eporu ol.tlre Regisrrar tJudicial-l) is placed on record.

¶50

In view the said r.eporl and also in view of the cornprornise entel'ed betrveen the petitioner and the 2,d respondent, dated 23.05.2020,I.A. Nos.3, 4 and 5 of 2020 are allowed. Consequently, the Criminal Petition is ailowed and the FIR No.94 of.2020 pending against the petirioners on rhe file of l(arkhana police Sration. lh derabad is quashed.

¶51

Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if an1,, shall stand closed.

¶52

Sd/.I.NAGA LAKSHMI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //rRUE coPY/ t ({Y>-SECTION OFFICER

¶53

To, 1. The Xl Additional Chief^{t,4etropolltanMagistrate Court'at Secunderabad'} Hvderabad District

¶54

, it; SA;;-nirtu^{otti""t,Karkhana Police Station, Hvderabad Citv' Hvderabad} District

¶55

:. i*o C'Cs to^{Public Prosecutor,HighCourt for the State of Telangana'at} Hyderabad [OUT]

¶56

a. Oire CC to Sri lmmaneni^{Rama Rao,Advocate[OP|JC]}

¶57

o;; cC io Monammed^{AfzalKhan,Advocate[OPUC]}

¶58

Two CD CoPies

¶59

(Along with a copy of Joint^lVlemo)

x'\k

HIGH^COURT

KLJ

DATED:^O8/09/2020

ORDER

CRLP.No.2320^{ol 2020}

¶66

And

¶67

l.A.Nos. 3,^{4 and 5 of 2020}

¶68

1 H E 14 I.-'
oo 11 SEP 2020 p
C)
k
T i;O
C,

¶69

ALLOWING THE CRIMINAL^PETITION

¶70

\il 4"{fq

¶71

MEMORANDUM OF INT-E^RLOCUTORY APPLICATION

¶72

(UNDER sECrroN 320(6) Riw. <riz-oiti, p, cl

¶73

IN THE HIGH COUR.T FOR T}IE STATE OF TELANGANA : AT HVDERABAD

¶74

LA. No. oF 2020

¶75

¶76

CRLP No. 2320 0F 2020

¶77

Eelycen-: I

¶78

N R Mohan, S/o Ram Shankar, aged 38 yrs, Occ; Private Service, R/o 121, Karkhana 1 I Basti, Karkhana, Secundt:rabad

¶79

... Petitioner/ De-facto complainant/ Respondent No. 2.

¶80

ANI)

¶81

1 The State of^'l-elangana represented by The Public Prosecutor, High Court of 1-elangana at Hyderabad.

¶82

¶83

Respondernt/ Responderrt No.1

¶84

2 Azmalh @ Mohammed Azmathullah^Khan S/o,Habeebullah Khan R/o,^{H.No 110} Karkhana near Masjid, Secunderabad, Hyderabad-5000^{15, Telangana, India.} il

¶85

3 Mr. Khaleel Ahmed,^{S/o Late Shakeel Ahmed} Aged about 30 Years,^{Occ : Business,} Rlo 110, Karkhana^Bazaar, Secunderabad^{Cantonment,Sec'bad.}

¶86

...Respondent-s / Petitioners/Accused

¶87

lQIr\ll',4!-M{)

¶88

lltissubm]tthatthePetitioner/DefactoCon-lplarnanthereirlhasfileda complaint against^{the Respondents/ Petitioners / Acctlsed hereln nith Karkhana} police statlo n on^{08.05.2020 and the same was registered as Crime No 9412020} on the^{file of P'S Karkhanafor offencesunclersectlons 448, 323,506,504 R/ut} section 34^{IPIuThe Respondents / Petitioners / Accuseclhr:rein fileclQttash} Petition^{on th} I file of tlris^{l'tonorableCourt, cluringtlre course of linre due to}

¶89

*a \ d Petitioner^{/ Defacto} d elderlY^{the ResPondentsan} .on^{of lvell wishers an} Petitioner /^Defacto mPromise^{which result the} iainant^{arrived at a co} ir,,-rt,ithdrawallhisallegations,pleadings,acquisitionsetc ,nPlainant^intendcoLo as made^{agajnstthe Respondents / Petitioners/ Accused herein and thesamel} miy Ue^{quashed in the interest of justice'}

¶90

It^{is submittedthat the Respondents/ Petitioners/ Accusedand Petitioner} /^{Defacto Complainanthave amicably settled the clispute at the interventionof} elders^{and well wishers and friends the matterhas been compromisedbetween} i themintermsoflvlemorandumofCompronlisedated23-05.2020.Hencethe both^{parties cameto compromlsein the above Crl'P No, 23ZOof 2020 against} I Crime No.^9]4 ofi 2020 of P.S^Karkhan IJnd both the^{parties lrave no claims or} I rights against^{each other in future'}

Place: Hyderabad

Date: p-08-2020

@--

Counsel for^Petitioner /^De-facto Complainant / Respondent^{Ncl. 2}

¶95

I Itt N? Counsel for Re(pondents No.2 & 3/ Petitioners / Accused

¶96

s/ NI\r ?-.,

¶97

Petitioner / De-facto^complainant /^{ResPondentNo. 2}

¶98

[,t t^,/'n ,/ '^,"; Respondent No.2 / Petitioner / Accused

¶99

,$u2

¶100

Respondent No.3 / Petitioner / Accused

Azmath , Mohammed Azmathullah Khan v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Azmath , Mohammed Azmathullah Khan v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K. Amulya Vs The State of Telangana And Another

Maladi Ramadevi ,Naramma and 2 others Vs The State

Maladi Subba Rao Vs The State of Telangana

R.Rama Koteshwar Rao Vs The State of Telangana and Another

Jadhav Santosh Vs The Additional Assistant Director

Neeli Srikanth Vs The State of Telangana