Allowed

Mohammed Ifteqar Ahmed and 6 Others v. The State of Telangana and Another

Telangana HC16 Nov 2020CRLP/4814/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court allowed GLintin no. 2 3 of 2020 and Criminal Petition No.4814 of 2020 upon confirming a compromise between the petitioners (accused in an FIR) and the complainant (former wife). Proceedings under IPC Sections 498-A, 406, 506 and DPA Sections 4, 6 were quashed pending said compromise.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Petition and Interlocutory Applications allowed; proceedings against petitioners/accused in Crime No.453 of 2019 under Sections 498-A, 406, 506 IPC and Sections 4, 6 DPA are quashed.

Mohammed Ifteqar Ahmed and 6 Others Vs The State… — Matrimonial and Divorce | Telangana HC (2020)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

IVONDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER

¶3

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN

¶6

l.A.Nos. 2 and 3 of 2020 ln/and

¶7

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4814 OF 2020

¶8

Common CT in l.A.No. 2 of 2020 and Criminal Petition

¶9

Between:

¶10

I,4ohammed lfteqar Ahmed, S/o. Gulam Jeelani, Aged about 27 years, Occ. Private Service, Rio. H.No.4-25-313, Wadi E lVahmood, Vijeta Hotel, Rajenderangar.

¶11

Ayesha Begum, W/o. Gulam Jeelani, Aged about 5'1 years, occ. Household, R/o. H.No.4-25-313, Wadi E l/ahmood, Vijeta Hotel, Rajenderangar.

¶12

Gulam Jeelani, S/o. Shaik lmam, Aged about 68 years, Occ. Business, Rlo. H.No 4-25-313, Wadi E lVlahmood, Vijeta Hotel, Rajenderangar.

¶13

It/lohammed Mustafa Ahmed, Sio. Gulam Jeelani, Aged about 20 years, Occ. Student, R/o. H.No.4-25-3l1 1, Pillar No.24'1 , Sulemannagar, Rajendernagar, Ranga Reddy District.

¶14

Mohammed l,4urtuza Ahmed, S/ o. Gulam Jeelani, Aged about 18^years, Occ. Student, R/o. H.No.4-25-313, Wadi E fi/ahmood, Vijeta Hotel, Rajenderangar.

¶15

Zeenath @ Qamer Unnissa, W/o. Mohd.Azhar D/o. Gulam Jeelani, Aged about 32 years, Occ. Household, R/o. H.No.4-25-313, Wadi E^[r,4ahmood, Vijeta Hotel, Ralenderangar.

¶16

Bushra @ Bushra Begum, W/o. Yawar, D/o. Gulam Jeelani, Aged about 29 years, Occ. Household, R/o. H.No.4-25-3111, Pillar No.241, Sulemannagar, Rajendernagar, Ranga Reddy District.

¶17

... Petitione rs/A1 to A7

¶18

AND

¶19

'1 . The State of Telangana, represented by its Public Prosecutor High Court of Telangana, Hyderabad.

¶20

...Respondent

¶21

1. Faheem Begum, D/o. Mohammed Ali, Former wife of lVohammed lfteqar Ahmed, Aged about 20 years, Occ.Household, R/ o.^{'19-5-29/41lD,} tvahmood, Kishanbagh, Rajendernagar.

¶22

.. Responde nt/Com plaina nt

¶23

Petition under Section 320 (6) Read with Section 482 of Cr.P C^praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the^petitioner compound the offence Registered against the Respo nd ents/Accused Nos. 1 and 7 Under Sections 498-4, 406,and 506, lPC,4,6 DPA registered in FIR No. 453 of 2019 on the file of the^P.S Rajendernagar Cyberabad District and quash the^proceedings against the Respondents/petitio ners/accused Nos. 1 and 7 herein Crlp.No . ol 2020.

¶24

/.A. NO: 3 OF 2020

¶25

Between:

¶26

Faheem Begum, D/o. [,4ohammed Ali,^{Formerwife of l,4ohammedlfteqar Ahmed'} Aged about 20 years, Occ.Household,^R/ o. 19-5-29/41lD,^Mahmood, Kishanbagh. Rajendernagar.

¶27

...Petitioner/Defacto Complainant

¶28

AND

¶29

lr/ohammed lfteqar Ahmed, S/o. Gulam Jeelani Aged^{about 27 yeas,} Occ. Pvt.Service, R/o. H.No.4-25-313, Wadi E^{ltilahmood, VijetaHotel,} Rajenderangar.

¶30

Ayesha Begum, W/o. Gulam Jeelani, Aged about 51^{years, occ.Household,R/o.} H.No.4-25-313, Wadi E l/lahmood, Vijeta Hotel, Rajenderangar.

¶31

Gulam Jeelani, S/o. Shaik lmam, Aged about 68^years, Occ.Business,^R/o. H.No.4-25-313, Wadi E lVlahmood, Vijeta Hotel, Rajenderangar.

¶32

lr/ohammed Mustafa Ahmed, S/o. Gulam Jeelani, Aged about 20^years, Occ.Student, Rr/o. H.No.4-25-311 1, Pillar No.241, Sulemannagar, Rajendernagar, R.R.Dist

¶33

lt4ohammed lVlurtuza Ahmed, S/ o. Gulam Jeelani, Aged about 1B years, Occ.Student, R/o. H.No.4-25-313, Wadi E tr,4ahmood, Vijeta Hotel, Rajenderangar.

¶34

Zeenath @ Qamer Unnissa, W/o. l\ilohd.Azhar D/o. Gulam Jeelani. Aged about 32 years, Occ.Household, R/o. H.No.4-25-3i3, Wadi E l\4ahmood, Vijeta Hotel, Rajenderangar.

¶35

Bushra @ Bushra Begum, W/o. Yawar, D/o. Gulam Jeelani. Aged about 29 years, Occ.Household, R/o. H.No.4-25-311 1, Pillar No.241, Sulemannagar, Rajendernagar, R.R.District.

¶36

. . . Respndents/Accused

¶37

The State of Telangana and Another, Rep by its Public Prosecutor High Court of Telangana, Hyderabad

¶38

... Responde nUResponde nt

¶39

Petition under Section 320 (2) Read with 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit and Joint Memo of Compromise filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to compromise the proceedings against the Accused Nos. land 7 in Crime No. 453 of 2019 P.S Rajendernagar, on the file of XIV Additional lvletropolitan [t/lagistrate at Rajendernagar in View of the compromise entered between the petitioner and respondent / accused No. 1 to 7 in the interest of lustice.

¶40

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4814 OF 2020

¶41

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the [Vemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Quash the proceeding of crime No.453 of 2019 on the file of the P.S Rajendernagar Cyberabad District.

¶42

l.A. NO 10F20

¶43

Petition under section^{482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstancesstated} in the Memorandum of^{GroundS of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased} to stay all further^{proceeding in crime No. 453 of 2019 on the file of the P.s} Rajendernagar Cyberabad^District.

¶44

This Petition coming^{on for hearing, upon perusingthe Memorandum of} Grounds of criminal^{Petitionand upon hearingthe argumentsof sri lvloid Ahmed,} Advocate for the^{Petitioners in l.A.No.2 0f 2020and criminalPetition and} Respondents Nos.1 to^{7 in l.A.No.3 ol 2O2O and Sri l,4ohd Hameed, Advocatefor the} petitioner in l.A.No.3 of 2O2O and Respondent No.2^{in LA.No.2oI 2020and criminal} petition and the Public Prosecutor appearing of the Respondent^{No.1in l.A.No.2 and} Criminal Petition and^{the Respondent No.8 in l.A No 3 of 2020}

¶45

The Court made the^{following:ORDER}

¶46

.IHE HONOURABI,E SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHN'IAN

¶47

I.A. Nos.2 and 3 of 2020 in / and CRIMINAL PETITION No.4814 OF 2020

¶48

ORDER:

¶49

This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioners - accused Nos.l to 7 to quash the proceedings against them in Crime No.453 of 20 l9 pending on the file olRajenclranagar Police Station, Cyberabad. 'l'hc ol'l'ences alleged against the petitioners are under Sectrons 498-A, '10(r^{and 50(r IPC arrcl 4 ancl(r of'DorvrvProhibition Act}

¶50

During pendency ot' tlre present crintinal petition, thc parties have enterecl into corrpromise.^'l'he petitioners accr.rsecl Nos.l to 7 llled t.A No.2 ol 2020 seeking pern.rission to contpound the of-tences ancl the 2"'r responclent de facto complainant flled I.A No.3 ol' 2020 to permit her to compromise the matter and to quash the proceedings against the petitioners in the above said crime.

¶51

Vide order dated 08.10.2020, this Court, after recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the^?"'l responclent, directecl the petitioners ancl the 2'"1 responclent to appear belbre the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court lbr their identillcation and also directed the Registrar (Judicial) to submir a report to tlrat ell-ect by 19. 10.2020. Pursuant to the said orcier, rlre Registrar (Judiciai-l) has subnrittecl his rcport clatecl 1i.10.2020.

¶52

In the report date<j 13.10.2020 ol.the Registr.ar (.tudiciat_t). it is stated that on oral exami,ation, the 2,,.i respondent has statcd that she had filed cornplaint agai.st the petitioners and another in cri..re No.453 of 2019 of p.S. Rajendranagar, Cyberabad, for the oftbnces under Sections 498-,4, 406 and 506 IpC and 4 and 6 of the Dowry Prohibition Act and that now she has approached this Court fbr recording thc comprornise between her and the petitioners. The said rcport of thc Registrar'(.ludicial-l). dated 13.10.2020 is placecl on rccorcl.

¶53

ln view thc said leport ancl also in vierv of the contpr.ontise cntcred bctrveen the 2'"r res;rondent ancl the pctitioners, LA. Nos.2 anri 3 o12020 ale allowed. Consequently, thc Criminal Petition No.48 l4 ol 2020 is allowed and the proceedings against the petitionersAccused Nos.l to 7 in Crime No.453 ol 2019 pending on the flle of Rajendranagar Police Station, Cyberabad, are quashed.

¶54

Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.

¶55

Sd/.B.SATYAVA ASSISTANT REG AR ,TRUE COPY' SECTION OFFICER

¶56

To, 1. The XIV Additional Metropolitan lVagistrate, Cyberabad, at Rajendranagar, Ranga Reddy District.

¶57

The Station House Officer, Rajendernagar Police Station, Cyberabad District 3. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana. at Hyderabad [OUT]

¶58

One CC to Sri lr/oid Ahmed, Advocate IOPUC]

¶59

One CC to Sri l,4ohd Hameed, Advocate [OPUC

¶60

Two CD Copies

¶61

(Along with a copy of Joint Memo) IVIVK

\ ^-

HIGH COURT

KLJ

DATED:16/11/2020

ORDER R l.A.Nos. 2 and 3 ol 2020 ^ ---tilAnd .,f, cnlp.ruo76-r+ of 2o2oi'

¶67

ALLOWING THE l.A.Nos. 2 AND 3 OF 2020 IN TERMS OF COMPROMISE AND ALLOWING THE CRL.P

¶68

@
-'ra

¶69

I	NTHE HIGHCOURToTJUD]CATUREAT:HYDDRABAD F.o<br>THD STATE OPrEi..TICNruA'
- rJc	Crr.p,No,eiZtror2O2o t*eeni I
1,	MohammedIiteqarAhmed S/o.Gulam .jeclani Agedabout 27yeas, Occ:pvt.Service, .\lo1_No^{425-313,Wadi E Mahmood,} Vijeta Hotel,Rajenderangar.
2.	Ayesha Begum W/o.GulamJeelani, Agedabout51years,occ:Household, R/o. H.No.4-25-3l3,Wadi E Mahmood, Vijeta Hotel,Rajenderangar.
3.	Gulam JeelaniS/o.Shark Imam, Agedabout68years,Occ:Business, R/o. H.No.4-25-3l3,Wadi E Mahmood, VijctaHote1,Rajenderangar,
1	MohammedMustafaAhmed S/o.GulamJeelani, Agedabout20vears,Occ:Student, R/o,I-l.No.4-25-3ii1,PiliarNo.241, Sulema:rnagar,Rajendernagar,R.R.Dist
D	MohammedMurtuzaAhnred S/o.Gr-rlamJeela:ri, Agedabout1Byears,Occ:Student, R/o. H.No.4-25-3l3,Wadi E Mahmood, Vijeta Hotel,Rajenderangar.
O	Zeenath@Qamer Unnissa W/o.Mohd.AzharD/o.Gulam Jeelani, Agedabout32years,Qcc:Household, R/o.H.No.4-25-3l3,Wadi E Mahmood, Vijeta Hotei,Rajenderangar.
7	Bushra@BushraBegum W/o.Yawar, D/o.GulamJeelani, Agedabout29 years,Occ:Household, R/o.H.No.4-25-3111,PillarNo.241, Sulemannagar,Rajendernagar, R.R.District. Petitioners/ A.1toA.7 AND

¶70

¶71

// 2 //

¶72

1 The State of Telangana Rep. by its Public^Prosecutor Fligh Court of^Telangana,

¶73

l-l1,derabaC.

¶74

Resoondent

¶75

) Faheem Begum D1o. ir{ohammeci^A1i, Former rvife of Mohammed^{IfteqarAhmed.} Aged about 20 years, Occ:Householcl, R/o 19-5-29 l4l lD, Mahmood, ...

¶76

Kishanbagh, Rajendernagar.

¶77

... Respondent/ Complainant

¶78

JOINT MEMO FILED ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONERS AND RESPONDENT NO.2

¶79

May it please your Honour;

¶80

It is submitted that as per the advise of the elders and well wishers, the matter has been compromised out of the court and the respondent No.2/defacto complainalt and petitioners / accuse d No.1 to 7 have agreed to withdraw the complaint and hence no objection to quash the proceedings in in Crime No.453 of 2019 ol P.S. Rajendernagar, on the file of Hon'ble XIV Add1. Metropolitar-r Magistrate, at Rajendernagar against the petil.ioners / accu scd No.I ro 7 .

¶81

llence. it is prayed that the Hon'ble Colrrt ma1' be pleased to quash the proceedings in Crin.re No.453 oi 2019 of P. S. Rajendernagar, on the file of Hon'b1e XIV Addl. Nletropolitan Magistrate, at Rajendernagar against the p etiti oners / accr-r sed No. 1 rc> 7 for the offence U/Sec.49B-A, 406, 506 IPC & Sec. 4 & 6 of D.P. Act in vieu,olthe compromise entered betn,een the petitioners and respondents/accused No. 1 to 3 n the interesttofjustice,

¶82

( l)1.

Mohammed Ifteqar Ahmed and 6 Others v. The State of Telangana and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohammed Ifteqar Ahmed and 6 Others v. The State of Telangana and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manthri Laxman Vs The State of Telangana and another

Jarripothula Narasimha Rao Vs State of Telangana

Repaka Prashanth , Sushanth Vs The State of Telangana

Bhukya Laxman Vs The State of Telangana

Valmik Namdev Chavan , Sunil Namdev Vs The State of Telangana

Bollamreddy Sri Sai Venkatesh Vs The State of Telangana