iPC. This Courl vide order dated 30.07.2018 in Crl.P. No.7530 of 2018, while granting anticipatory bail to thc petitioners herein, directed them to submit their passports before the Court concerned. Accordingly, they have submitted their passporls before the Couft below. The police, after completion of investigation have deleted the names of the petitioners. The charge sheet was filed against A1 to .A3 and the same was taken on file vide CC No.1 of 2020. Thereafter. the petitioners have filed Crl.M.P. No.25 of 2020 lor return of their' passports. The Court below vide irnpugned order, dated 06.01.2020 dismissed the application filed by the petitioners on the ground that the order of this Courl in Clr.P. No.7530 of 2018 does not give power to the Court below rcgarding return of the passporl before the prior' peln-rission. There is no prior permission n-rentioned in the order dated 30.07.2018 in Crl.P. No.7530 of 2018 of this Court. In the said order. tl.ris Court directed the petitioners herein to submit their passports and accordingly, they have subrnitted their passports in compliance of the said order. Therefore, there is no need to mention in the order dated 30.07.2018 for retum of passports. The Court below, instead of returning the passports to the petitioners by appreciating the fact tl.rat their names were deleted by the police during the course of investigation, dismissed the petition vide impugned order. The impugned order is thus erroneous and on misconception of law and facts. Therefore, the same is hereby quashed.
