In an appeal under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the High Court dismissed a petition seeking quashing of criminal proceedings after the petitioner withdrew the petition citing no subsisting cause of action.
The criminal petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OFSEPTET\iIBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.I-AKSHMAN
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2371 OF 2O2O
Between
Mr.M.Padma Rao, S/o. M. Kistalah, Aged about 49 years, Occ. Advocate, Rio. Villa No.43/A, Oorjitha Grand Vie-1, Beside Tridentapartment, Service Road, Gundlapochampally Village, Near Kompally, Medchal Malkajgiri DistricU Ranga Redciy District.
... PETTTTO N E R/AC C U S E D
AN D
RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Quash the proceeding in Crime.No, 372 ol 2020, Dated. 28-5-2020 registered by P.S. Pet Basheerabad Medchal Malkajgiri District, Cyberabad,
l.A. NO: 2 OF 2020
Petition under Section 482 of Cr. P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition,the High court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in crime. No. 372 of 2020, Dated. 28-5-2020 registered by P.S. Pet Basheerabad Medchal Malkajgiri District, Cyberabad,
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the [vemorandum of Grounds of criminar petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri sudarshan Reddy Duddugunta, Advocate for the petitioner and the public prosecutor, on beharf of the Respondent No.'1 None appeared for Respondent No,2
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
CRIMINAL PETITION No.2371 of 2O2O
ORDER:
Sri D. Sudharshan Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner/Accused has filed a letter dated 07.09.2020 before the Registr]' stating that he has instructions from thc petitioner to r,r,ithdrar.r' the present Criminal Petition as no cause of action is subsisting
In vieu, of the said submission, this Criminal Petition is dismissed as u'ithdrau'n.
Miscellaneous petitions, ii any, pending in this Crirninal
Petition, shall stand closed.
SD/- B. SATYAVATHI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
l( SEC TIoN OFFICER
To,
2\-
I
a
HIGH COURT
KL,J
DATED:1 5109t2020
1ELA
c) Ss
s
lot. \ i)
<br>li
ORDER
CRLP.No.2371 of 2020
DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION AS WITHDRAWN
<\q t\zo
<^o 4-){l-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow or dismiss a criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. after the petitioner withdraws it.
Mr. M. Padma Rao
The State of Telangana
Smt. Vidhi Baisiwala
K. Lakshman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
