Petitioner filed a petition under Section 439(2) Cr.P.C seeking to cancel bail granted to Respondent No.2. The petition was withdrawn after the family dispute was settled, and the court dismissed it as withdrawn.
Permission granted to withdraw the criminal petition; the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
IVONDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEIVBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTIGE K.LAKSHMAN
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2043 OF 2020
Between:
K.Amulya, W/o M. Praveen Kumar, Aged about 32 years, Occ. Pvt. Employee, C/o C.Daniel, H.No.264l3RT, Ground Floor, Vijayanagar Colony, Masab Tank, Hyderabad - 500 057
...PETITIONERY PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENT/ RESPONDENT
Petition under Section 439(2) ot Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to cancel the bail granted to the Respondent No.2 vide orders dated 1810212020 passed by the Hon'ble High Court in Crl.P. No.1123 of 2020 as the Respondent No.2 failed to prove his bonafides and violating his own pleadings in the bail petition and intedering with the course ofjustice by abusing the process of law
LA. NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 439(2) of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the [/emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.2 to comply the orders passed by the lll l,4etropolitan [t4agistrate, Nampally, Hyderabad passed in DVC No.95 of 2014 i.e., orders dated 2010312019 directing the Respondent No.2 topay compensation amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and to return 25 Tulas of gold or its value to the Petitioner immediately failing which cancel the bail already granted in Crl.P.No.1123 oI 2020 passed by this Honourable Court
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the I/emorandum of Grounds of Crimrnal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri tt/.ARUN KUIVAR, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and for the Respondent No.2 not appearing in person or by Advocate.
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN
CRIMINAL PETITION No.2043 OF 2020
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner filed letter dated 03.09.2020
before the Registry seeking to withdraw the criminal petition as they
have settled the family dispute out of court.
withdlawn. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand
closed.
Sd/.N,CHANDRASEKHAR o ASSISTANT REG RAR
//TRUE COPYII
To
SECTION OFFICER
I
HIGH COURT
DATED:07/09/2020
1tt e srA r^'
o
,>(
c (
ot) 15 SEP 2020 :l
/ I
Dt s r L Ta*(-!
ORDER
CRLP.No.2043 of 2020
DISMISSING THE CRL.P. AS WITHOUT COSTS.
\ *\Lo
4il''t
K. Amulya
State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor
V. Praveen Kumar
K. Lakshman
N. Chandrasekhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
