The High Court dismissed a contempt petition against a Tahsildar. The court held that, lacking proof that the petitioner filed the required Form VI-A application online, the petitioners could not establish disobedience of the High Court's earlier order.
The Contempt Case is closed. The petitioner is left to work out his remedies in the pending writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 666 OF 2020
Contempt Case filed Under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondents herein for his willful violation and deliberate disobedience of the Orders of the High Court made in W.P.No.23954 of 2019 dated 05.1 1.2019.
Betwee n:
Ir/. A. lVoiz Abbasi, s/o, Late Ir/ A Hai Abbasi, Ageda bout 72 yearc, Occ. Business, Resident of H. No. 23-1 -1 009 I 1 3, l,4ohgalpura, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER
AND
l/r. Kishan Naik, The Tahsildar, Koheer lvlandal, at Zaheerabad, Medak District, Telangana State.
,..RESPONDENT NO.4
Counsel for the Petitioner: SMT MOHD ABDUL QAVI ABBASI
Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following: ORDER
-2
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
CONTEMPT CASE No.666 oF 2O2O
ORDER:
This Contempt Case is filed alleging even though the Court directed to consider the application submitted by the petitioner for mutation of his name in revenue records, the respondent-Tahsildar has not considered the request made by him.
5, In the absence of material to disprove the statement of learned Assistant Government Pleader, it cannot be said that the respondent-Tahsildar violated the directions of this Court necessitating initiation of contempt proceedings.
the writ pe tition. pending miscellaneous petttions, if an.y, shaJJ
stand closed.
I I
SD/. SRI K.SRINIVASA RAO DEPUTY REGIS R
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To
HIGH COURT
DATED:0411212020
1 H rii^
o^
?i<br>oo 21DEC2020 ll.ll
C, ,I
_L I i.3 irtlc *
ORDER
CC.No.666 of 2020
CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE
t$niu'r )-\t't*
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner violated the High Court order limiting the mutation application to Form VI-A via online portal.
Ir/. A. lVoiz Abbasi
Mr. Kishan Naik
P. NAVEEN RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
