Dismissed

Ch.Ram Reddy v. Government of Andhra Pradesh

Telangana HC1 Nov 2019WP/9838/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition challenging the initiation of Section 145 Cr.P.C. proceedings over agricultural land dispute. Court dismissed petition as no cause survived since injunction was obtained and proceedings were closed, finding no further relief warranted. Contains no substance beyond dismissal.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed with no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions, if any, stood dismissed.

Ch.Ram Reddy Vs Government of Andhra Pradesh — Property and Title | Telangana HC (2019)

¶1

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. KESHAVA RAO WRIT PETITION No.9838 of 2014

¶2

ORDER:

¶3

There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners.

¶4

The prayer sought in the writ petition is as under:

¶5

“… to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents No.2, 3 and 4 in initiating the proceedings under Section 145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, bearing proceedings Lr.No.A/466/2014 dated 28.01.2014 at instance of the respondent No.5 is illegal, arbitrary, malafide, and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and against the principles of natural justice and further direct respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners agriculture under guise of Section 145 Cr.P.C. proceedings on the petitioners’ property in Sy.Nos.190/A, 202/A, 204/E, 205/A, 207, 208, 209/E, 210/E, 211/A and 212/A to an extent of Ac.21.07 gts vide patta No.179 of Chittapuram Village, Valigonda Mandal, Nalgonda District.”

¶6

Learned Government Pleader appearing for respondent No.4 placed on record written instructions dated 16.10.2019 issued by the Sub-Inspector of Police, Valigonda Police Station, Rachakonda Commissionerate.

¶7

From a perusal of the said written instructions, it is revealed that there was a land dispute in the Chittapuram Village, Valigonda Mandal between one Cheerika Ram Reddy and Cheerika Vanita Rani and both the parties visited Chittapuram Village on 07.06.2013 and 10.06.2013 to assess the situation as there was apprehension of law and order problem in the village. Therefore, the Station House Officer, Valigonda Police Station, addressed a letter to the Tahsildar, Valigonda Mandal to impose Section 145 Cr.P.C., proceedings. Pursuant thereto, the 3^rd respondent issued the impugned proceedings. It is further mentioned in the written instructions that Section 145 Cr.P.C., proceedings were closed as the petitioners obtained injunction orders in I.A.No.230 of 2015 in

¶8

¶9

O.S.No.151 of 2015 on the file of the V Additional District Judge, Bhongir.

¶10

In view of the above said facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no further cause would survive in the writ petition and the same is liable to be dismissed.

¶11

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs.

¶12

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand dismissed.

¶13

_____________________
P. KESHAVA RAO, J
Date: 01.11.2019.
ES

Ch.Ram Reddy v. Government of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ch.Ram Reddy v. Government of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.T.Satheesan Palayad, Vs The State of Telangana

Gaddam Nagaraju, Vs The Government of Telangana rep by its Principal

Saini Thirupathi Vs The Superintendent of Police

Elukurthi Madan Mohan, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Dr.Ch.Jaipal Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

Shaik Arif , Arif, Hyd Vs Prl. Secy., Home Dept., Hyd and 2 Othrs