Dismissed

Saini Thirupathi v. The Superintendent of Police

Telangana HC31 Oct 2019WP/3104/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the police inaction regarding the brutal murder of Saini Ramesh. After reviewing written instructions confirming the death was a suicide following marriage stress, the Court found no further cause to survive and dismissed the petition, granting liberty to raise objections before the concerned Court.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to raise objections before the concerned Court.

Saini Thirupathi Vs The Superintendent of… — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Telangana HC (2019)

¶1

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. KESHAVA RAO

¶2

WRIT PETITION No.3104 of 2014

¶3

ORDER:

¶4

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned

¶5

Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

¶6

The prayer sought in the writ petition is as under:

¶7

“… to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the action of the respondents No.1 to 3 in not taking any steps to investigate the offence of brutal murder of the petitioner’s son named Saini Ramesh, by an experienced officer in pursuance of the registering of FIR.No.144 of 2013 of PS Ramadugu of Karimnagar District is nothing but arbitrary, illegal, null and void and violative of principles of natural justice and also violative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India. Consequently, direct the respondents to entrust the investigation of the FIR.No.144 of 2013 of PS Ramadugu of Karimnagar District dated 18.11.2013 regarding the brutal murder of the petitioner’s son named Saini Ramesh and take necessary action against the culprits involved.”

¶8

During the course of hearing, learned Government Pleader placed on record written instructions dated 29.10.2019 issued by the Assistant Sub-Inspector of Police, Ramadugu Police Station, Karimnagar District.

¶9

From a perusal of the said written instructions it is revealed that on the complaint of one Saini Mohan a case in Crime No.144 of 2013 for the offence under Section 174 Cr.P.C. was registered on the file of Ramadugu Police Station. During the course of investigation, witnesses were examined and their statements were recorded. The investigation done disclosed that the deceased’s engagement ceremony was performed with Samatha on 15.11.2013 and he was taking his marriage stress and other problems upon which on 16.11.2013 at 12.30 hours he left from his house with his younger sister on motorcycle and went to Nallagundla gutta, Ramadugu and committed suicide by consuming poison. After completion of investigation, a final report was filed before the

¶10

¶11

concerned Court, after giving notice to the petitioner, referring it as “suicidal death”.

¶12

In view of the above said facts, this Court is of the opinion that no further cause would survive in the writ petition and the same is liable to be dismissed.

¶13

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. However, liberty is given to the petitioner to raise his objections, if any, before the concerned Court as per law. No order as to costs.

¶14

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand dismissed.

¶15

_____________________
P. KESHAVA RAO, J
Date: 31.10.2019.
ES

Saini Thirupathi v. The Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Saini Thirupathi v. The Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohd Ghouse Pasha, Vs Mohd. Hafiz and Another

Mohd.Khaja Mohiuddin Qadri, Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh

M/s Manisha Agri Biotech Pvt. Ltd. a Company Vs State of Andhra Pradesh

Smt. M. Rajavva, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary

Nawab Md.Zafaruddin Khan Vs The Station House Officer

M.T.Satheesan Palayad, Vs The State of Telangana