The petition was dismissed as settled law on the decision in Godrej Sara Lee Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner (CT) and pending miscellaneous petitions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE SANJAY KUMAR
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE K. LAKSHMAN
W RI T PETTI ON No.8 6 8 0 of 2 0 1 7
ORDER:
Sri A.V.A. Siva Kartikeya, learned counsel representing Sri S. Vivek Chandrasekhar, learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the issue raised in this writ petition stands settled against the petitioner in the light of the decision reported in GODREJ SARA LEE LI MI TED v . ASSI STANT COMMI SSI ONER ( CT)1 .
In that view of the matter, this writ petition no longer survives for independent consideration and is accordingly dismissed. Pending miscellaneous petitions shall also stand dismissed. There shall be no
order as to costs.
_
SANJAY KUMAR, J
K. LAKSHMAN, J
September 3, 2019
DSK
1 (2017) 106 VST 97
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
GODREJ SARA LEE LIMITED v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (CT)Followed¶6
GODREJ SARA LEE LIMITED v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (CT) 1
Sri S. Vivek Chandrasekhar
Respondent
Sanjay Kumar
K. Lakshman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
