Writ petition dismissed as infructuous pending statement by counsel for petitioner. No substantive legal issue decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE SANJAY KUMAR
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE K. LAKSHMAN
W RI T PETI I TON No.1 9 2 6 9 of 2 0 1 7
ORDER : (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Sanjay Kumar)
Ms. J. Sunitha, learned counsel representing
Mr. D. Ramakrishna, learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the matter has become infructuous.
Recording the said statement, the writ petition is dismissed as
infructuous. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand
dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
__
SANJAY KUMAR, J
K. LAKSHMAN, J
September 3, 2019
DSK
Ms. J. Sunitha
Sanjay Kumar
K. Lakshman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
