Petition challenging account classification as non-performing asset was closed as negotiations regularized the account, leaving nothing for adjudication.
Writ petition closed with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE V. RAMASUBRAMANI AN & THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE A. RAJASHEKER REDDY
W RI T PETI TI ON No.4 1 6 8 6 of 2 0 1 8
ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice V. Ramasubramanian)
The petitioner has come up with the above writ petition challenging the classification of their account as non-performing asset.
Consequently, pending miscellaneous applications, if any,
shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
_____________________ V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J ____________________ A. RAJASHEKER REDDY, J
February 15, 2019 DSK
THE PETITIONER
BANK (RESPONDENT)
V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
A. RAJASHEKER REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
