The High Court closed a writ petition challenging eviction proceedings by a respondent bank, taking a cue from the DR Tribunal's withdrawal of proceedings. Pending miscellaneous petitions were dismissed. No costs awarded.
Writ petition closed; pending miscellaneous petitions dismissed; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAJASHEKER REDDY
WRIT PETITION No. 2152 OF 2019
ORDER: (per V. Ramasubramanian, J)
The petitioners have come up with the above writ petition challenging the action of the respondent-bank in seeking to evict them from their residential premises.
Today, Mr.G.Vasantha Rayudu, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the bank has filed a Memo before the Debts Recovery Tribunal seeking to withdraw the proceedings against the petitioners. Therefore, he stated that the writ petition may be closed.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions if any pending in the writ petition shall stand dismissed. No order as to costs.
_____________________ V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J
_____________________ A. RAJASHEKER REDDY , J
February 15, 2019 gkv
2
Petitioners
Respondent-Bank
V. Ramasubramanian
A. Rajasheker Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
