Partly allowed

Katkuri Narsimha Reddy, v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC19 Feb 2019WP/3248/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition where the petitioner sought release of a seized vehicle alleged to be used for contraband liquor transportation. The Court held the matter must be adjudicated by the Deputy Commissioner of Excise.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to approach Deputy Commissioner of Excise under Section 34 for interim custody pending adjudication.

Katkuri Narsimha Reddy, Vs The State of Telangana — Landlord and Tenant | Telangana HC (2019)

¶1

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT PETITION No. 3248 of 2019

¶2

O R D E R:

¶3

Petitioner asserts that he is the owner of vehicle bearing No.TS 02 EK 1512 (Unicon Bike); that respondent No. 3 – Station House Officer, P.S. Jammikunta, Karimnagar District, seized the said vehicle on the ground that there is a violation of the provisions of the Telangana Excise Act (for short, ‘the Act’); that in spite of his approaching, respondent No.3 is not releasing the subject vehicle and that he made an application before the 2^nd respondent for release of the subject vehicle but the same was not accepted. In the circumstances, he approached this Court by way of filing this writ petition.

¶4

Learned Government Pleader for Home submits that without there being any permit and licence, there is a transportation of 48 IMFL liquor bottles and 48 M.C. Whisky quarter bottles in the subject vehicle. He further submits that a case has already been registered and the matter requires further investigation and enquiry. He also submits that in terms of Section 34 of the Act, the Deputy Commissioner of Excise is the authorised Officer to adjudicate upon the matter, as such, the petitioner may approach the said authority seeking release of the subject vehicle.

¶5

CKR, J W.P.No.3248 of 2019

¶6

¶7

In those circumstances, the Writ Petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to approach the Deputy Commissioner of Excise under Section 34 of the Act and seek interim custody of the subject vehicle, pending adjudication of the main case. As and when such application is made, the Deputy Commissioner shall consider the same as early as possible as keeping vehicle idle would not enure to the benefit of anyone as held by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in a catena of judgments.

¶8

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending in this writ petition, shall also stand closed. No costs.

¶9

_ _________________________
CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J
19 th February, 2019
sj

Katkuri Narsimha Reddy, v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Katkuri Narsimha Reddy, v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunita Surana Vs The State of Telangana

D. Malyadri Vs The State of Telangana

Vattela Mailesham Vs District Forest Officer

M/s Gowri Shankar Saw Mill and Tiber Depot, Vs The State of Telangana

Ravula Laxmi Vs The State of Telangana

Chirra Elender Vs The State of Telangana