Court stayed the accrued power of respondents to initiate contempt proceedings if petitioners adhere to the sanctioned plan. The writ petition was closed without any substantive order as costs.
Writ Petition closed. No order as to costs. Respondents granted liberty to initiate contempt proceedings upon violation of undertaking.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM
W.P.No.2345 of 2019
ORDER
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Government Pleader for Municipal Administration and Urban Development for respondent No.1 and Sri N. Ashok Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for respondents 2 to 5.
CKR, J W.P.No.2345 of 2019
2
18th February, 2019 sj
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the action of respondents in restraining petitioners from construction as per sanctioned building permissions is arbitrary and illegal.
Petitioners
Municipal Administration and Urban Development
Respondents 2 to 5
6th Respondent
Challa Kodanda Ram
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
