Dismissed

Pittalla Lingaiah v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC19 Mar 2019WP/3133/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single bench order dismissing a writ petition as premature. The court held that since a revision petition was pending against the appellate order sought to be implemented, and a stay application was pending in that revision, the petition could not be entertained at that stage.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as premature. Pending miscellaneous petitions also dismissed. No order as to costs.

Pittalla Lingaiah Vs The State of Telangana — Land Acquisition | Telangana HC (2019)

¶1

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTI CE SANJAY KUMAR

¶2

WRI T PETI TI ON No.3133 OF 2019

¶3

O R D E R:

¶4

1 The prayer of the petitioner in this case reads as under:

¶5

“For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is hereby prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 4t respondent in not considering the representation dated 1612019 submitted by the petitioner herein to implement the proceedings B/657/2017 Dt 31.12.2018 as illegal arbitrary and unjust and violation of Telangana pattadar passbooks Act 1971 and consequently direct the 4th respondent to consider the representation Dt 16.1.2019 and initiate action in accordance with law and pass such other relief or reliefs as this Honble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.”

¶6

2 Perusal of the representation dated 16.01.2019 demonstrates

¶7

that the petitioner thereby sought implementation of the appellate order dated 31.12.2018 passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Karimnagar District.

¶8

3 Sri N. Hari Prasad, learned counsel appearing for the 4^th respondent, would however inform this Court that as against the aforestated appellate order dated 31.12.2018, the 4^th respondent filed a revision under Section 9 of the Telangana Rights in Land and Pattadar Passbooks Act, 1971, before the Joint Collector, Karimnagar, and the same was taken on file as Revision Petition No.D1/2037/2018. Learned counsel would further inform this Court that a stay application was also filed in the said Revision Petition and the same is pending consideration.

¶9

4 In the light of the aforestated facts, it is not open to the petitioner to straightaway seek implementation of the appellate order at this stage. In the event the stay application filed by the 4^th

¶10

¶11

respondent in the pending revision or the main revision is dismissed, the petitioner would be at liberty to make such request. As that stage is yet to pass, the present Writ Petition is premature and is accordingly dismissed.

¶12

5 Pending Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, shall also stand

¶13

dismissed. No order as to costs.

¶14

____________________ JUSTI CE SANJAY KUMAR

¶15

Date: March 19, 2019. Kvsn

Pittalla Lingaiah v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pittalla Lingaiah v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

T. Srinivas Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

Yadavelli Varija Vs The State of Telangana

Smt. G. Vindhya Rani Vs The State of Telangana

Syed Hussain Mirza Vs The State Government of Telangana

Chukka Ramulu, Vs The State of Telangana

M/s Next education India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Trimurti Learning Services Pvt. Ltd.