This single-paragraph order dismisses Arbitration Application No. 172 of 2014 for non-prosecution. The applicant and counsel failed to appear or present representation on the hearing dates.
Arbitration Application dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE SANJAY KUMAR
ARBI TRATI ON APPLI CATI NO No.172 OF 2014
ORDER:
1 There was no representation when this Arbitration Application was taken up for hearing on 08.02.2019 and again on 12.03.2019. It was accordingly directed to be posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’ on 19.03.2019.
2 Today, the matter appears under the said caption but yet again, there is no representation either for the applicant or its learned counsel. It is therefore clear that the applicant and its learned counsel are not
interested in prosecuting the Application.
prosecution. No order as to costs.
----------------------SANJAY KUMAR, J.
Dt: 19.03.2019 Kvsn
Applicant
Sanjay Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
