Petitioner filed writ seeking direction to investigate an FIR and initiate action. Court was informed investigation completed and charge-sheet filed; held no cause survives; petition closed.
Writ petition closed without any orders being made or any relief being granted?
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. KESHAVA RAO WRIT PETITION No.28995 of 2011
ORDER:
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
“ …to issue a Writ or order or direction, especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus
i) declare the inaction on the part of the respondents 3 & 4 is not conducting the investigation and not initiating any action pursuant to registration of FIR No.285 dated 11.07.2011 on the file of PS., Karimnagar Rural, Karimnagar and insisting the petitioner to compromise the issue with accused is illegal and arbitrary
ii) Consequently direct the respondent to investigate the Crime No.285 dated 11.07.2011 on the file of the PS, Karimnagar Rural, Karimanagar and initiate appropriate action as per law
iii) and pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.”
2
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. No
costs.
___________________ P. KESHAVA RAO, J
8th November 2019
mar
1 issue framed by the court
Whether cause of action is barred due to completion of investigation and filing of charge sheet before the writ petition filing date.
Petitioner
Respondents 1 to 4
P. KESHAVA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
