K. Pranish, Hyd. v. Prl. Secy., Home Dept. and 2 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Single-bench order dismissing a writ petition for non-prosecution as no instructions were provided by absent counsel.
Single-bench order dismissing a writ petition for non-prosecution as no instructions were provided by absent counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. KESHAVA RAO
WRIT PETITION No.10986 of 2013
ORDER:
Ms. Vidyu Latha, learned counsel, appearing for the learned counsel for the petitioner, informs the Court that the petitioner has taken away the bundle with no objection vakalat from their office long back and they have no instructions.
However, from the perusal of the record, no other counsel entered appearance by filing vakalat. From this, it appears that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the matter diligently.
Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand
dismissed.
_____________________________
JUSTICE P. KESHAVA RAO
Date: 07.11.2019
ska
2
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. KESHAVA RAO
Writ Petition No.10986 of 2013
Date: 07.11.2019
ska
Petitioner
P. Keshava Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court