Allowed

M/s Y.V Rao and Associates v. State of Telangana and 2 Others

Telangana HC8 Nov 2019WP/24512/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court allowed the writ petition regarding life tax on a BMW vehicle. It directed the respondents to permit registration without demanding additional tax if the tax paid on the invoice complies with the law and the vehicle meets all registration parameters, following earlier precedents.

What did the court decide?

Directing respondents to register the BMW vehicle without demanding additional life tax if tax paid on invoice is compliant and vehicle meets other registration parameters.

M/s Y.V Rao and Associates Vs State of Telangana and 2 Others — Corruption | Telangana HC (2019)

¶1

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO

¶2

WRIT PETITION No.24512 OF 2019

¶3

Dated:08.11.2019

¶4

Between:

¶5

M/s. Y.V. Rao and Associates, Having its office at age 40 years, 4-404, Bhavyasrisailam Arcade, Dharmam Karam Road, Ameerpet, Hyderabad, rep., by its Partner Y.V. Rao .. Petitioner

¶6

And

¶7

State of Telangana, rep., by its Principal Secretary, Transport Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others .. Respondents

¶8

This Court made the following:

¶9

¶10

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.24512 OF 2019

¶11

ORDER :

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Transport.

¶13

Petitioner claims to have purchased BMW Make, BMW 6 Series Gran Turismo 620D Luxury Line BSIV for an invoice of Rs.54,00,000/-. At the time of purchase, petitioner claims to have paid life tax of Rs.7,56,000/- and was given temporary registration number as TS 09 CRTR 5146. Subsequently, when the petitioner approached the respondents to register the vehicle permanently, it was asked to pay life tax on ex-showroom price of the vehicle holding that petitioner paid less amount than the tax payable on ex-showroom price of the vehicle. According to petitioner, life tax is payable on the invoice, but not on the ex-showroom price and therefore petitioner is not required to pay the additional tax demanded.

¶14

In support of the claim that petitioner is not required to pay additional amount demanded by the respondents, learned counsel placed reliance on the decision in W.P.No.5286 of 2018, dated 02.05.2018, which was upheld by the Division Bench in W.A.No.805 of 2018, dated 29.01.2019.

¶15

Learned Single Judge of this Court held that the State cannot be allowed to levy life tax on the ex-showroom price shown in the price list, when it is not the actual cost of the vehicle and the life tax has to be levied on the actual cost of the vehicle as paid by the purchaser of the vehicle which can be

¶16

¶17

reflected from the invoice. This view of learned Single Judge was upheld by the Division Bench of this Court.

¶18

Learned Government Pleader does not dispute the fact that the issue is covered by the decision referred to above.

¶19

Following the earlier decision in W.P.No.5286 of 2018 dated 02.05.2018, this Writ Petition is also allowed directing the respondents to register BMW Make, BMW 6 Series Gran Turismo 620D Luxury Line BSIV of the petitioner without demanding additional life tax, if the life tax already paid based on the invoice dated 26.10.2019 is as per the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act and the vehicle is fulfilling all other parameters for registration. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand

¶20

closed.
____________________
P.NAVEEN RAO, J
Date:08.11.2019
KH

M/s Y.V Rao and Associates v. State of Telangana and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s Y.V Rao and Associates v. State of Telangana and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Baragada China Venkaiah Vs The State of Telangana and 3 Others

M/s. Sreelatha Plasticcs Vs The State of Telangana and 2 others

Potla Venkateswarlu, Venkataiah Vs The State of Telangana

P.Vishnukanth Vs Sri Anjani Kumar, IPS

M/s Vas Logistructure Corpo Vs The State of Telangana and 3 Others

Marlapalli Srinivasulu Vs The State of Telangana