Dismissed

Baragada China Venkaiah v. The State of Telangana and 3 Others

Telangana HC7 Nov 2019WP/23778/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner challenged inaction regarding his claim for an Occupancy Right Certificate over inherited Neeradi Inam lands. The court directed the Revenue Divisional Officer to finalize the claim within eight weeks and communicate the outcome without expressing an opinion on merits.

What did the court decide?

Daily direction to finalize petitioner's claim and issue orders within eight weeks of receipt of this order.

Baragada China Venkaiah Vs The State of Telangana and 3… — Land Acquisition | Telangana HC (2019)

¶1

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO

¶2

WRIT PETITION NO.23778 OF 2019

¶3

Date: 07.11.2019

¶4

Between:

¶5

Baragada China Venkaiah, S/o. Somaiah, Aged about 45 yrs, Agriculture & job, R/o.Nimmalagudem, Hamlet of Sujathanagar, Sujathanagar Mandal, Bhadradri-Kothagudem District.

¶6

And

¶7

The State of Telangana, Rep., by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad & others.

¶8

The Court made the following:

¶9

¶10

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO

¶11

WRIT PETITION NO.23778 OF 2019

¶12

ORDER:

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Revenue for respondents.

¶14

Petitioner claims that his grandfather was inamdar of agricultural land to an extent of Acs.18-31 guntas in Sy.No.1034 A, Ac.1-28 guntas in Sy.No.1038 AA and Acs.4-06 guntas in Sy.No.1039 of Nimmalagudem Village, Sujathanagar Mandal, Bhadradri-Kothagudem District and he was granted Neeradi Inam by the erstwhile Nizam Government in Singabhupalem Tank. His grandfather’s name was reflected in possession and title holder column and also recorded as Neeradi Inam in Kasra Pahani. After the demise of his grandfather lands were inherited by his father and after his death, three sons including petitioner have succeeded, whereas one son died. Petitioner claims to have submitted application for grant of Occupancy Right Certificate. In response, notice in Form-II was issued on 01.07.2019 by the Revenue Divisional Officer. Alleging that there is no further progress, this writ petition is filed.

¶15

A copy of the notice issued by the RDO on 01.07.2019 is filed as Ex.P.1.

¶16

In view thereof, without expressing any opinion on merits the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the RDO-3^rd respondent to finalize the claim of petitioner and pass appropriate orders as warranted by law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order and communicate the same to the

¶17

¶18

petitioner. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

¶19

P.NAVEEN RAO, J

¶20

7^th November, 2019 Rds

Baragada China Venkaiah v. The State of Telangana and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Baragada China Venkaiah v. The State of Telangana and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K. Pradeep Vs The State of Telangana

Smt. Chintalapally Manjula W/o. C. Ramdev Reddy, Vs The State of Telangana, Rep.

Goshikonda Swetha Vs State of Telangana, and 4 others

M/s. Sreelatha Plasticcs Vs The State of Telangana and 2 others

Potla Venkateswarlu, Venkataiah Vs The State of Telangana

Latchamsetty Sanjay Vs State of Telangana and 2 Others