Single judge dismissed the writ petition as infructuous due to efflux of time upon hearing counsel's submissions. Miscellaneous petitions were closed without costs.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
W.P.NO.19677 OF 2013
O R D E R
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the
respondents.
All the learned counsel submit that by efflux of time the cause in the
writ petition does not survive, and it has become infructuous.
In view of the above submission, the writ petition is dismissed as
infructuous.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. No order
as to costs.
--------------------------------------------
A.RAJASHEKER REDDY,J
DATE:01—10—2019
AVS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition is maintainable after efflux of time.
Petitioner
Respondents
A. RAJASHEKER REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
