Pisati Venkat Reddy, Vs The State of Telangana

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY

W.P.NO.18858 OF 2019

O R D E R

The grievance of the petitioner is that, though he obtained building permission from the 3^rd respondent – Gram Panchayt and proceeding with the construction in the subject land, the Panchayat Secretary of the 3^rd respondent, is interfering with his construction activity. Hence the present writ petition.

¶5

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶6

Sri G.Narender Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for the 3^rd respondent submits that as the petitioner is making construction in excess of the land owned by him, villagers have made complaint and based on the same, the construction activity of the petitioner was directed to be stopped, and hence no exception can be taken.

¶7

Heard learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj for respondents 1 and 2.

¶8

It is to be seen that as long as the building permission obtained by the petitioner is in force and the petitioner is proceeding with the construction in conformity with the said permission, 3^rd respondent cannot cause interference to the construction activity of the petitioner. In case, petitioner makes construction by occupying Gram Panchayat land, or in violation of the sanctioned plan, it is always open to the 3^rd respondent to take appropriate action in accordance with law, after giving notice and opportunity of hearing.

¶9

With the above direction, writ petition is disposed of.

¶10

Interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. No order as to costs.

¶11

---------------------------------------- A.RAJASHEKER REDDY,J

¶12

DATE:24—09—2019 AVS

Pisati Venkat Reddy, v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pisati Venkat Reddy, v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vanga Raghava Reddy Vs The State of Telanagana

Ahmed Mohiuddin Vs The State of Telangana

Syed Jalal Hussaini and another Vs The State of Telangana

Smt.Marka Santhoshi Matha Vs Bank of India

Acumen Software Technologies Limited, Vs Union of India, Ministry of Corporate Affairs

Smt.Pochaveni Yellawa Vs Telangana State Road Transport Corporation and 3 other