Dismissed

N. Venkateswara Rao v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC20 Nov 2019WP/18444/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner challenged the proposed issuance of pattadar passbooks and title deeds regarding ceiling surplus lands, alleging illegal conversion. The court held the writ petition was not maintainable as key parties claiming ownership were not impleaded and the petitioner was not remediless, dismissing the petition.

What did the court decide?

Through dismissal of the writ petition, no declaratory relief was granted to declare the proposed issuance of title deeds as illegal.

N. Venkateswara Rao Vs The State of Telangana — Land Acquisition | Telangana HC (2019)

¶1

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO

¶2

WRIT PETITION No.18444 OF 2018

¶3

Dated:20.11.2019

¶4

Between:

¶5

N. Venkateswara Rao, S/o. Veerabhadra Rao, Aged about 47 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Kalluru (V & M), Khammam District, Telangana State

¶6

.. Petitioner

¶7

And

¶8

The State of Telangana, rep., by its Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others .. Respondents

¶9

This Court made the following:

¶10

¶11

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.18444 OF 2018

¶12

ORDER :

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Revenue for the respondents.

¶14

This Writ Petition is filed alleging that though the family of the petitioner is contesting the proceedings under the Telangana Agricultural Land (Conversion for Non-Agricultural Purpose) Act, 2006 (for short, ‘the Act’) as their cases are pending before the Land Reforms Tribunal, the authorities are seeking to declare certain persons as having purchased the lands much prior to the coming into force of the Act and conferring their ownership rights and therefore the same is illegal. The averments in the affidavit also proceed in the same direction. In the prayer, the petitioner seeks to declare the proposed action on the part of respondents 3 to 5 in processing the preparation and issuance of pattadar passbooks and title deeds to the ineligible people in respect of the ceiling surplus lands in Survey Nos.14 t 289 of Laxmipuram Village, Kalluru Mandal, Khammam District, as illegal.

¶15

The Writ Petition is not maintainable for two reasons. Firstly, none of the parties against whom the allegation of claiming ownership much prior to the coming into force of the Act are made as parties to the Writ Petition, whereas the declaration sought would be affecting directly their entitlement, if at all such entitlement is valid in law. Secondly, even according to the prayer, what was alleged was to declare the

¶16

¶17

proposed action on the part of respondents 3 to 5 in processing the preparation and issuance of pattadar passbooks and title deeds to ineligible people as illegal and on assumption, no such relief can be granted. It cannot be said that the petitioner is remediless, if such illegal action is taken against him without following due process by the competent authority. Therefore, the Writ Petition is liable to be dismissed.

¶18

The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

¶19

____________________
P.NAVEEN RAO, J
Date:20.11.2019
KH

N. Venkateswara Rao v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

N. Venkateswara Rao v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shaik Mohammed Vs The State of Telangana

T. Kanaka Durga Venkata Satyavathi Vs Prl. Secy., Rev. Dept. and 3 Others

M.Rajalingam Vs Principal Secretary Revenue

Ushasri Ventures and Developers Vs The State of Telangana and 2 others

Sri. a. Yelraj Vs The State of Telangana

S.Shyam Prasad Vs The State of Telangana