Disposed

M/s. Ayyappa Wood Based Industry v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC16 Aug 2019WP/17401/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This common order disposes of two writ petitions filed by Wood-based industries seeking permission to add a Horizontal Band Saw to their license. The court disposed of the petitions by following the order passed in W.P.No.17224 of 2019, holding that specific permission is required for additional machinery.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted liberty to apply to authorities for addition of horizontal band saw within 12 weeks of the order.

M/s. Ayyappa Wood Based Industry Vs The State of… — Service and Employment | Telangana HC (2019)

¶1

THE HON’ BLE SRI JUSTI CE CHALLA KODANDA RAM

¶2

WRI T PETI TI ON Nos.17401 and 17540 of 2019

¶3

COMMON ORDER:

¶4

Since the subject matter and also the relief sought for in these writ petitions is one and the same, they are being disposed of by this common order.

¶5

The petitioners are Wood-based industries. They were given license to use Band Saw Vertical equipment in their unit, however, as the petitioners found it difficult to run their unit with only Vertical Band Saw, they made an application to the 3^rd respondent to consider inclusion of Horizontal Band Saw in the license. As no orders were passed by the 3^rd respondent by considering their applications, they filed these writ petitions.

¶6

At the hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner, and also the learned Government Pleader for Forests, submit that the subject matter of these writ petitions is squarely covered by the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.17224 of 2019, dated 13.08.2019, and therefore similar orders may be passed in these writ petitions also.

¶7

This Court, by order dated 13.08.2019 disposed of the W.P.No.17224 of 2019

¶8

by observing as under:

¶9

“ 5. Having regard to the respective submissions, this Court, prima facie, agrees w ith the contention of the learned Government Pleader that the very fact that the specification in the licence as to installation of only one vertical band saw itself is a communication that permission is required to add horizontal band saw . The very averments of licence in Clause 3 read as under:

¶10

3. The licensee is permitted to run the follow ing machinery and equipment.

¶11

S.No.	Name of the machinery	Capacity (H.P)
1.	One Vertical Band Saw 1 No.	15

¶12

The aforesaid clause w ould make it clear that specific permission is required for adding a particular machine. There being no challenge to the regulations, in the facts of the present case, the

¶13

petitioner is given liberty to make an application in terms of the rules seeking addition of ‘horizontal band saw ’ w hich shall be considered by the authorities concerned, in accordance w ith law , w ithin a period of tw elve (12) w eeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.”

¶14

Accordingly, the writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the order passed in W.P.No.17224 of 2019, dated 13.08.2014. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.

¶15

_____________________ CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J

¶16

16^th August, 2019

¶17

KSM

¶18

THE HON’ BLE SRI JUSTI CE CHALLA KODANDA RAM

¶19

WRI T PETI TI ON Nos.17401 and 17540 of 2019

¶20

16^th August, 2019

¶21

KSM

M/s. Ayyappa Wood Based Industry v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s. Ayyappa Wood Based Industry v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Syed nusrath Ali Vs The State of Telangana

Smt.Potharla Yashoda Devi Vs The State of Telangana

M/s M.S.Traders Vs The State of Telangana and 3 others

Sri Ravinder Kumar Ritesh Kumar Vs Shravan Badruka

Pabba Sahithi, Vs The State of Telangana

M/s. Bhawani Wood Based Industry Vs The State of Telangana