Dismissed

Smt. Pasula Laxmamma, v. The State of Ap Rep by its District Collector

Telangana HC21 Nov 2019WP/11412/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court dismissed a writ petition seeking a mandatory order for police protection. Finding that the underlying criminal case against the alleged threats had concluded in conviction, the court held no further cause persisted.

What did the court decide?

No further cause survives; writ petition dismissed. Pending miscellaneous petitions closed. No order as to costs.

Smt. Pasula Laxmamma, Vs The State… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Telangana HC (2019)

¶1

HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE P. KESHAVA RAO

¶2

W RI T PETI TI ON No.1 1 4 1 2 of 2 0 1 4

¶3

ORDER:

¶4

There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners.

¶5

The prayer sought in the writ petition is as under:

¶6

“…the Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent No.1 herein to direct the Respondent Nos.3 & 4 herein to provide Police protection to the Petitioners and their family members as they are having life threat from the Respondent Nos.5 to 8 as being illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and in violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent Nos.3 and 4 to provide police protection to the Petitioner and her family members and pass such other order, or orders as are deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.”

¶7

The learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 4 placed on record written instructions dated 19.11.2019 issued by the Assistant Sub-Inspector of Police, Kalwakurthy Police Station, Nagarkurnool District.

¶8

From a perusal of the said written instructions, it is revealed that basing on the complaint lodged by the petitioner No.3, a case in Cr.No.192 of 2009 for the offence under Sections 427 and 447 of the Indian Penal Code was registered on the file of the Kalwakurthy Police Station on 21.08.2009. During the course of investigation, the witnesses were examined and their detailed statements were recorded. After completion of investigation, charge sheet was filed before the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kalwakurthy and the same was numbered as C.C.No.500 of 2009. After trial, the case ended in conviction on 16.02.2017.

¶9

¶10

In that view of the matter, this Court is of the opinion that no further cause would survive in the writ petition and the same is liable to be dismissed.

¶11

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. As a sequel thereto, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶12

________________ P. KESHAVA RAO, J

¶13

November 21, 2019 YSK/ DSK

Smt. Pasula Laxmamma, v. The State of Ap Rep by its District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Pasula Laxmamma, v. The State of Ap Rep by its District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr. P.Swathi Vs The Commissioner of Police

A.Pandarinath Vs The State of Andhra pradesh

Hann Bin Abdullah, Vs The State

Varala Srinivas , Sisindri Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Dharamapuri Rama Devi, Vs The Station House Officer. P.S

Jona Savarapu Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal