Court allowed petitioner to indicate BC 'E' Category status after initial mistake. Petitioner to apply upon notification; verification required.
Petitioner to apply for admission indicating BC 'E' Category after notification; treated as such if verified genuine.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN AND
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. KESHAVA RAO
WRIT PETITION No.11221 OF 2019
ORAL ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice V. Ramasubramanian)
Mr. A. Prabhakar Rao, learned Standing Counsel, takes notice for respondent Nos.2 and 3.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in
the writ petition, shall stand closed.
__________________________ V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J
__________________________ P. KESHAVA RAO, J
June 10, 2019 Mgr
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to admit the petitioner as belonging to BC 'E' Category after she initially indicated Unreserved Category.
Petitioner
2nd Respondent
3rd Respondent
V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
P. KESHAVA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
