B. Shiva Shankar v. The Assistant General Manager and Authorized Officer
Case brief
What is this about?
SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN & THE HON’BLE…
SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN & THE HON’BLE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE V. RAMASUBRAMANI AN
& THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE P. KESHAVA RAO
W RI T PETI TI ON No.1 0 2 6 6 of 2 0 1 9
ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice V. Ramasubramanian)
After arguing for some time, the counsel for the petitioner seeks
time to withdraw the writ petition with liberty.
Petitioner is permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach either the Debts Recovery Tribunal or the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, as the case may be. Consequently, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no
order as to costs.
______
V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J
P. KESHAVA RAO, J
June 7, 2019
DSK
Petitioner
Debts Recovery Tribunal/Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal
V. Ramasubramanian
P. Keshava Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court