The Writ Appeal was dismissed as the underlying order pertained to an interlocutory application in a pending Writ Petition, precluding distinct judicial review of an intermediate step.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAGHVENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.AMARNATH GOUD
WRIT APPEAL NO.190 OF 2019
Dated: 13.03.2019
Between:
…APPELLANTS
And
…RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the Appellants: Mr. Ravi Kondeti
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: Mr. M.V.L.Srinivas for
Mr. M.V.S. Sai Kumar
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 5: GP for Revenue
The Court made the following:
2
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAGHVENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN
AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.AMARNATH GOUD
WRIT APPEAL NO.190 OF 2019
JUDGMENT: {Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice T.Amarnath Goud}
This Writ Appeal is filed against the order of the learned Single Judge in I.A.No.1 of 2018 in W.P.No.42060 of 2018 dated 22.11.2018.
Since the order passed is only on the interlocutory application, the appellants herein ought to have filed appropriate applications for getting their relief adjudicated. Since the Writ Petition is pending and the order passed is not a final order in the interlocutory application, this Court is not inclined to entertain the Writ Appeal.
Giving liberty to the appellants to avail the remedies
available under law, this Writ Appeal is dismissed.
There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand dismissed.
______________________________________ (RAGHVENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN, J)
__________________________ (T.AMARNATH GOUD, J)
13th March 2019 RRB
Mitta Raghuveera Reddy
Smt. M. Rajeswari Reddy
Raghendra Singh Chauhan
T. Amarnath Goud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
