Second Appeal No. 710 of 2001, decided on April 18, 2019. The court dismissed the appeal as it was filed on the ground that the underlying decree had already been satisfied.
The appeal was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE Dr . JUSTI CE SHAMEEM AKTHER
SECOND APPEAL No.7 1 0 OF 2 0 0 1
JUDGMENT:
This appeal is filed by the appellant/ plaintiff aggrieved by the judgment and decree, dated 06.07.2001, rendered in A.S.No.314 of 2000 on the file of XI Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court (Fast Track Court), Hyderabad.
2 . Heard. Perused the record.
3 . Learned counsel for the appellant/ plaintiff would submit that the decree has been satisfied and therefore, nothing survives for adjudication in this appeal.
dismissed as infructuous.
Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Second Appeal shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
April 18, 2019. MD
appellant/ plaintiff
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
