The High Court dismissed an appeal filed by Dr. V. Padma Krupanandam as withdrawn by the appellant, following the filing of a withdrawal memo on record.
The appeal was dismissed on the grounds of withdrawal by the appellant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAGHVENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.AMARNATH GOUD
F.C.A.NO. 5 OF 2006
Dated: 18.03.2019
Between: Dr. V.Padma Krupanandam
…APPELLANT
And
Dr.B.Shyam Sunder Raj
…RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellant: Mr. S.Padma for Sri B.Nalin
Kumar
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. E.Samba Siva Pratap
The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAGHVENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.AMARNATH GOUD
FCA.NO.5 OF 2006
O R D E R (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice Raghvendra Singh Chauhan)
Both the parties, Dr. V.Padma Krupanandam, the appellant, and Dr.B.Shyam Sunder Raj, the respondent, are present before the court. They have submitted their adhar cards in order to establish their identity. They have also been identified by their respective counsel.
Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo for withdrawing
the appeal.
The memo shall be taken on record.
Therefore, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. No order
as to costs.
DATE: 18—03—2019
AVS
Dr. V. Padma Krupanandam
Dr. B. Shyam Sunder Raj
Raghvendra Singh Chauhan
T. Amarnath Goud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
