Appeal was listed before the High Court of Telangana. The appellant filed a memo for withdrawal of the appeal, which was accepted. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAGHVENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.AMARNATH GOUD
F.C.A.NO.127 OF 2018
Dated: 18.03.2019
Between:
Chintakindi Sadanand Goud.
…APPELLANT
And
Ms. Chintakindi Shilpa.
…RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellant: Mr. K. Shrikanth
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. Nandigam Krishna Rao
The Court made the following:
2
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAGHVENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN
AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.AMARNATH GOUD
F.C.A.NO.127 OF 2018
JUDGMENT: {Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice Raghvendra Singh Chauhan}
The appellant has filed a memo, dated 15.03.2019, for
withdrawal of the appeal.
The memo shall be taken on record.
Therefore, the appeal is, hereby, dismissed as withdrawn.
There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand
dismissed.
____________
(RAGHVENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN, J)
(T.AMARNATH GOUD, J)
18 th March 2019
RRB
Chintakindi Sadanand Goud
Ms. Chintakindi Shilpa
Raghvendra Singh Chauhan
T. Amarnath Goud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
