Allowed

Cherala Prabhakar v. State of Telangana

Telangana HC27 Dec 2019CRLP/949/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order allows a Criminal Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash proceedings against the accused. The court recorded a compromise between the parties, including payment of settlement money, and disposed of the case based on the consent.

What did the court decide?

The criminal proceedings in Crime No.211 of 2017 and miscellaneous petitions pending are quashed. The Criminal Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is allowed in terms of the compromise.

Cherala Prabhakar Vs State of Telangana — Caste Atrocities | Telangana HC (2019)

¶1

HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI

¶2

I.A.No.2 of 2019 In/and CRIMINAL PETITION No. 949 of 2018

¶3

ORDER:

¶4

The petitioner, who is accused in Crime No.211 of 2017 of Ellanthakunta Police Station, Rajanna Sircilla District, filed this Criminal Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash the proceedings in the above crime, which was registered for the offences punishable under Sections 447, 427 and 506 of I.P.C. and Section 3 (1) (r) (s) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

¶5

During pendency of the Criminal Petition, I.A.No.2 of 2019 came to be filed by the second respondent to record the compromise and to compound the offences. Along with the petition, a joint memo which is signed by the parties and their counsel, photographs of the parties and photostat copies of their Aadhar Cards came to be filed. It is stated in the affidavit that at the intervention of elders and well wishers, the parties have settled their disputes in terms of the compromise and the petitioner agreed to pay a sum of Rs.2,60,000/ - to the second respondent towards final settlement and the second respondent.

¶6

Today, both the parties are present before this Court and they were identified by their respective counsel. This Court, when examined, both the parties have stated that at the instance of the elders, they have settled the matter out of the Court and the

¶7

¶8

second respondent has stated that she has received Rs.2,60,000/ - and she has no objection for quashing the proceedings against the petitioner.

¶9

1. In the light of the compromise arrived at between the parties, the compromise memo filed by both the parties is recorded and I.A.No.2 of 2019 is ordered.

¶10

Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed in terms of compromise, and the proceedings in Crime No.211 of 2017 of Ellanthakunta Police Station, Rajanna Sircilla District, against the petitioner are hereby quashed.

¶11

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending, shall stand closed.
________________
JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI
27.12.2019
gkv

¶12

¶13

HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI

¶14

gkv

¶15

I.A.No.2 of 2019
In/and
CRIMINAL PETITION No. 949 of 2018
Dated: 27.12.2019

Cherala Prabhakar v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Cherala Prabhakar v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ganta Satyanarayana Vs The State of Telangana

P.Venkata Laxman Rao Vs the State of Telangana.,Rep.,Pp and Another

Lunavth Bhanu Chander Vs The State of Telangana

Nemani Krishna Rajashekar Vs State of Ap., and Another

Rashid , Syed Rashid Ui Hasan Vs Chevi Reddy Chandra Shekar Reddy, And Another

Yellugola Umamaheshwari Vs Nandi Khannan