In a petitioner filed a criminal petition to quash proceedings under Sections 494 and 34 IPC. The court, noting a compromise and mutual divorce between parties, allowed the petition and quashed the criminal charges.
The proceedings in C.C.:521 of 2013 against the petitioner are quashed and the criminal petition is allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI
I.A.No.1 of 2019 In/and CRIMINAL PETITION No. 11200 of 2013
ORDER:
2
second respondent has no objection for quashing the proceedings against the petitioner.
3
HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI
gkv
I.A.No.1 of 2019
In/and
CRIMINAL PETITION No. 11200 of 2013
Dated: 27.12.2019
2 issues framed by the court
Whether criminal proceedings initiated under Sections 494 read with 34 of I.P.C. should be quashed based on a settlement and mutual divorce.
Whether the compromise memo filed by the parties merits the quashing of criminal proceedings.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner (Accused No.1)
Second Respondent
G. Sri Devi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
