Allowed

Dara Sathaiah v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC27 Dec 2019CRLP/1543/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court quashed criminal proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C. following a recorded compromise between the accused petitioners and the second respondent. The compromise required the withdrawal of the complaint after the petitioners cancelled a sale deed.

What did the court decide?

Criminal proceedings in Crime No.6 of 2019 quashed; petitioners to deposit Rs. 5,000 each with Telangana High Court Bar Association.

Dara Sathaiah Vs The State of Telangana — Quashing and FIR | Telangana HC (2019)

¶1

HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI

¶2

I.A.No.3 of 2019 In/and CRIMINAL PETITION No. 1543 of 2019

¶3

ORDER:

¶4

The petitioners, who are accused in Crime No.6 of 2019 of Kandukuru Police Station, Rachakonda, filed this Criminal Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash the proceedings in the above crime, which was registered against the petitioners for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 447 and 427 read with 34 of I.P.C.

¶5

During pendency of Criminal Petition, I.A.No.3 of 2019 came to be filed by the second respondent to record the compromise. Along with the petition, a joint memo which is signed by the parties and their counsel, photographs of the parties and Photostat copies of their Aadhar Cards came to be filed. It is stated in the affidavit that at the intervention of elders and well wishers, the parties have settled their disputes in terms of Compromise. As per the compromise, the second respondent agreed to withdraw the complaint as the petitioners have cancelled the sale deed executed by them in favour of third parties.

¶6

Today, both the parties are present before this Court and they were identified by their respective counsel. This Court, when examined, both the parties have stated that at the instance of the elders, they have settled the matter out of the Court and the

¶7

¶8

second respondent has no objection for quashing the proceedings against the petitioners.

¶9

1. In the light of the compromise arrived at between the parties, the compromise memo filed by both the parties is recorded and I.A.No.3 of 2019 is ordered.

¶10

Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed in terms of compromise, and the proceedings in Crime No.6 of 2019 of Kandukuru Police Station, Rachakonda, against the petitioners are hereby quashed, subject to the condition of both the parties are depositing Rs.5,000/ - each to Telangana High Court Bar Association, within a period of two weeks from today.

¶11

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending, shall stand closed.
________________
JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI
27.12.2019
gkv

¶12

¶13

HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI

¶14

gkv

¶15

I.A.No.3 of 2019
In/and
CRIMINAL PETITION No. 1543 of 2019
Dated: 27.12.2019

Dara Sathaiah v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dara Sathaiah v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ganta Satyanarayana Vs The State of Telangana

P.Venkata Laxman Rao Vs the State of Telangana.,Rep.,Pp and Another

Lunavth Bhanu Chander Vs The State of Telangana

Nemani Krishna Rajashekar Vs State of Ap., and Another

Rashid , Syed Rashid Ui Hasan Vs Chevi Reddy Chandra Shekar Reddy, And Another

Yellugola Umamaheshwari Vs Nandi Khannan