The court disposed of four arbitration applications where counsel for the applicant stated the dispute was settled and they did not wish to proceed. All pending miscellaneous applications were closed.
Applications disposed of; pending miscellaneous applications closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY ARBITRATION APPLICATION Nos 24, 26, 30 and 31, of 2015
COMMON ORDER:
This Arbitration applications are filed under Sections 11 (5) and (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the applicant and the respondents in terms of agreements of sale entered into between them on 25.01.2018, 19.01.2018, 01.11.2017 and 17.11.2006 respectively.
Learned counsel for the applicant in all the applications submits that dispute is settled outside the Court and they do not want to pursue the arbitration applications.
Recording the same, these applications are disposed of. Pending miscellaneous applications if any shall stand closed.
_________________________ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY,J 24-10-2019 Nvl
2
3
1 provisions across 1 enactments
A RAJASHEKER REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
