Disposed

Jami Gurunadha Rao v. State of Andhra Pradesh

Telangana HC24 Apr 2018WP/9043/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner challenged inclusion of his land in prohibited properties under Section 22-A(1)(c) of the Registration Act, 1908. As he had already filed an application with the Commissioner which was pending, the Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the Commissioner to examine the claim expeditiously.

What did the court decide?

Directing the Commissioner of Endowments to examine the petitioner's application dated 19.02.2018 to exclude the property from the list of prohibited properties and pass appropriate orders within six

Jami Gurunadha Rao Vs State of Andhra Pradesh — Property and Title | Telangana HC (2018)

¶1

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO

¶2

WRIT PETITION No.9043 OF 2018

¶3

Dated:24.04.2018

¶4

Between:

¶5

Jami Gurunandha Rao, S/o.Late Tavitayya, Aged about 59 years, Occ: Cultivation, R/o.Aarangipeta Village, Peddaravupalle Panchayat, Laveru Mandal, Srikakulam District. .. Petitioner

¶6

And

¶7

State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Revenue (Endowment – IV) Department, Room No.135, 4^th Block, Ground Floor, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi,

¶8

Guntur District and others .. Respondents

¶9

The Court made the following:

¶10

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.9043 OF 2018

¶11

ORDER:

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader.

¶13

Petitioner claims that he is the owner and is in possession and enjoyment of land to an extent of Ac.5-63 cents in Survey No.460/1 of Murapaka Village, Laveru Mandal, Srikakulam District. Petitioner is aggrieved by inclusion of Ac.2-28 cents of land, out of Ac.5-63 cents, in the list of prohibited properties under Section 22-A (1) (c) of the Registration Act, 1908. Therefore, the petitioner submitted an application to the Commissioner, Endowments Department, on 19.02.2018. Alleging inaction on the said application, this Writ Petition is filed.

¶14

Since an application is already filed before the Commissioner of Endowments for deletion of the above mentioned property from the list of prohibited properties and as the learned counsel for petitioner states that the said application is pending, without expressing any opinion on merits, this Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Commissioner of Endowments, A.P. Endowments Department, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District (respondent No.2), to examine the claim of the petitioner as ventilated in his application, dated 19.02.2018, to exclude the property described above from the list of prohibited properties, and pass appropriate orders, as warranted by law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt

¶15

of a copy of this order. It is needless to observe that if the Commissioner, Endowments Department, does not agree for deletion of the subject land from the list of prohibited properties, it is open to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy as available under law.

¶16

Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶17

____________________ P. NAVEEN RAO, J

¶18

Date:24.04.2018

¶19

¶20

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO

¶21

WRIT PETITION No.9043 OF 2018

¶22

Dated: 24.04.2018

¶23

Jami Gurunadha Rao v. State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jami Gurunadha Rao v. State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Feroz Khan Vs The State of Telangana

Smt. D. Sreelakshmi Vs The Government of A.P. Rep. by its Chief Secretary

Bollam Thirupathi Vs Meerpally Sager

Harish Manjunath, Vs Prl.Secy., Revenue dept., State of T.S.

M/s. Cascade Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., Vs The State of Telangana, rep. by its Secretary

N. Parvathi Reddy Vs The State of Telangana