The single judge admitted and recorded that the petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn, and pending miscellaneous petitions were also dismissed without any costs.
Nothing granted; the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION NO.3639 OF 2018
Date: 23.04.2018
Between:
Md.Feroz Khan, s/o late Ismail Khan, Aged 36 years, Occu: Business, R/o. H.no.3-80, Ameenpur (V&M), Sangareddy district, Telangana.
…..Petitioner
and
The State of Telangana,, rep.by its Prl.Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and another.
…..Respondents
The Court made the following:
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION NO.3639 OF 2018
ORDER:
Learned counsel for petitioner seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the writ petition. To that effect letter dated 18.04.2018 is filed before the Registry.
Recording the same, Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending miscellaneous petitions shall stand dismissed. No costs.
__________________________
JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
Date: 23.04.2018
kkm
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION NO.3639 OF 2018
Date: 23.04.2018
kkm
Md. Feroz Khan
State of Telangana, rep. by its Prl. Secretary, Revenue Department
another
P. Naveen Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
