This order quashes a writ petition filed by a former Tribunal applicant. The High Court held that the Tribunal's interim order directing salary payment was complied with after authorities released the arrears, making the petition moot.
The writ petition is closed/quashed; pending miscellaneous petitions are closed; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE SANJAY KUMAR AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE M.GANGA RAO
WRI T PETI TI ON No.8467 OF 2017
ORDER : (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Sanjay Kumar)
This writ petition was filed by the applicant in O.A.No.3020 of 2016 on the file of the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad, aggrieved by the failure on the part of the authorities, the respondents in the O.A., to abide by the interim order dated 04.08.2016 passed therein. By the said order, the Tribunal directed the respondents in the O.A. to pay salaries to the petitioner-applicant which were due to her.
Upon abolition of the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad, insofar as the State of Telangana is concerned, O.A.No.3020 of 2016 was transferred from its file and renumbered as W.P (TR) No.6204 of 2017 and is presently pending on the file of this Court.
Be that as it may.
Learned Government Pleader for Services, State of Telangana, would inform this Court that by proceedings dated 09.06.2017, the District Educational Officer, Suryapet, released a sum of Rs.40,575/- towards arrears of salaries payable to the petitioner-applicant. The petitionerapplicant executed receipt dated 19.06.2017 in acknowledgment of having been paid the said salaries.
In the light of these proceedings, it is clear that interim order dated 04.08.2016 passed by the Tribunal has been sufficiently complied with. In the event the petitioner-applicant has any dispute with regard to the quantification of the arrears, it is for her to seek redressal thereof independently and the same cannot be made the subject matter of this writ petition.
The writ petition is accordingly closed.
2
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand closed in
the light of this final order. No order as to costs.
____________________
JUSTI CE SANJAY KUMAR
____________________ JUSTI CE M.GANGA RAO
Date: 11.10.2018 va
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the quashing of a writ petition is justified after the salaries in dispute were paid following the tribunal's interim order.
Petitioner-applicant
Respondents
SRI JUSTI CE SANJAY KUMAR
SRI JUSTI CE M.GANGA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
