Syed Aqbal v. Sri K v v. Gopal Rao
Case brief
What is this about?
This contempt case was filed for wilful disobedience of an order disbosing the main writ petition. Upon being informed that the petitioner's appeal was disposed of by the impugned official order, the court held the matter duly complied with and closed the contempt proceeding, advising the petitioner to seek separate redressal if aggrieved by the appellate order.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case closed as the court order was duly complied with; liberty reserved to seek redressal on the appellate order in separate proceedings.
What the court decided
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.GANGA RAO
CONTEMPT CASE No.2396 OF 2018
O R D E R : (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Sanjay Kumar)
This Contempt Case was filed alleging wilful disobedience to the order dated 25.04.2018 passed by this Court in W.P.No.14745 of 2018. By the said order, the Writ Petition was disposed of directing the Inspector General of Police, South Coastal Zone, Guntur Range, Guntur, to abide by the mandate of Rule 26(c) of the Andhra Pradesh State and Subordinate Services Rules, 1996, and pass appropriate orders on the petitioner’s appeal in accordance with law.
We are now informed by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services, State of Andhra Pradesh, that the petitioner’s appeal was disposed of by the Inspector General of Police, South Coastal Zone, Guntur Range, vide order dated 08.10.2018. A copy of the said order is placed on record.
In the light of this development, the order passed by this Court stands duly complied with. In the event the petitioner has any grievance with regard to the appellate order dated 08.10.2018, it is for him to independently seek redressal thereof by way of separate proceedings.
Reserving liberty to him to do so, the Contempt Case is closed.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand closed. No order as to costs.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a contempt case alleging non-compliance can be closed upon receiving information that the court order has been obeyed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Petitioner
- respondent
Assistant Government Pleader for Services, State of Andhra Pradesh
Coram
Sanjay Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- CC/2396/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court